US and UK 'lead push against global patent pool for Covid-19 drugs'
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
If the UK, US and Swiss governments are acting in a way which is harmful to everyone in the world, and against the wishes of 96% of their own population, a parallel power structure should be formed to lock them out and work around that.
Of course, that isn't being proposed.
What's being proposed is that the companies spending billions on research donate its results without compensation.
That would be a catastrophe for R&D, as in the next major health crisis, no companies would do any R&D fearing bankruptcy if they did.
Money exists for a reason, and things cost money for a reason.
Why is the state currently donating its results to companies profiting billions?
https://other98.com/taxpayers-fund-pharma-research-developme...
Frankly, I'm less concerned about the words on the paper than what people actually do.
It's just an open letter signed by various presidents etc.
Very much doubt anyone is expecting the US to sign even if it's non-binding. I mean they bailed on human rights council and UNESCO. UK...who knows they're in full on improv mode right now.
Each country's laws are meant to maximise it for its own citizens as long as the laws are applied without discrimination.
If you want to convince a large and poor country to accept your standards in patent protection, show them how a large pool of their population will be involved in productive R&D.
>We continue to support public-private partnerships for product development, and approaches such as non-exclusive voluntary licensing which promote affordable access for all while also providing incentives to create life-changing vaccines.
The researchers doing the actual work to create life-changing vaccines are clearly not driven by profit, nor do they actually get a share of that profit being salaried. The question is of a monetary incentive for funding the research in the first place. Seems to me that this is a strong argument for important research being done at state level since private companies won't do it without a profit incentive.
EDIT:
I expected this to get downvoted. Everyone loves socialism unless they belong to the richer group which is expected to settle the bill.
The hypocrisy is just staggering. Nobody has pushed or send help to countries struggling with SARS, MERS or Ebola. People are still dying from those viruses today. Nobody is pushing for groundbreaking changes to climate change so that we don't kill the people of tomorrow. Just some worthless PR bs agreemetns drafted at some bs EU meetings where countries agree to set low targets, still fail to meet them and just pay small fines for it to wash their hands and feel good about destroying our planet. But as soon as there's a threat to these old fat elites right now then all of a sudden they have a vetted interest in doing the right thing for themselves cough sorry I mean obviously the greater good of humanity in true PR language.
Humans are selfish pricks. The sooner one realises and accepts that as a fact, the sooner one can live in harmony in this world.
The people with the largest government-backed research budget and with the largest pool of data about Covid are likely Chinese. They'll probably also have enough patriotic citizens to try out new vaccines to benefit their country.
Now imagine if a working Covid drug is indeed developed in China. Because the US and UK hollowed out the sharing agreement, they'll then need to call in favors.
That might well ruin Trump politically, but at the very least it'll put both countries in a much weaker negotiation position for future trade agreements.
I just don't see any reason why the US or the UK might be leading this research globally. So why would this seem like a good idea for them?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/14/china-hacking-...
I don't even know what point you're trying to make.
But then again, why do US citizens travel to Asia for medical procedures? Because it's cheap and good enough.
Oh and didn't the UK pick Hong Kong and Singapore as their role models for revitalizing the country after Brexit?
And you maybe noticed that many high-profile Google research papers are full of Chinese last names?