> Let the birds and the bees live their rich lives.
Can city parks at least be "for humans"?
Where did children play before the invention of the lawn mower?
> Can city parks at least be "for humans"?
You mean, at least, besides the cities themselves, the parking lots, the industrial areas, the roads and highways, the suburbs. Yeah, at least. Poor humans. Give them at least the parks.
You could, but it wouldn't be fun.
Who are we to impose our aesthetic sensibilities on others.
Having people cook for you used to be reserved for rich people. Are you emulating slave owning aristocrats when you go to a restaurant?
You haven't seen my lawn. ;-)
My view is that the local people seem to prefer a park with cut grass, and these volunteers are helping them out. If the people want something else, they should decide.
Might it be a meadow instead of a lawn?