It almost seems deliberate to make things as subjective and opaque as possible. You know who else operate in this way? Grifters

Sure, there are tons of over simplifications or extrapolating data which support narratives in evolutionary psychology, especially on the pop psych end of things. The humanities are full of ideology in search of evidence. But this... modules of thought? That has to be some of the dumbest reductionist pigeonholing I've heard in a moment. Let's completely throw out what we know about neurology, endocrinology or biology as a whole, because... it makes me feel uncomfortable?

We are getting conned folks.