Hacker News Reader

Comment by aikinai | Hacker News Reader

If you haven’t already, try Capture One. It’s so much faster than Lightroom and, at least for my needs, has much better functionality as well.

View on HN

Serif Affinity alternatives for

Photoshop - https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/photo/

Illustrator - https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/designer/

InDesign - https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/publisher/

50% off each product (one-time purchase with updates, no subscription) too during the COVID pandemic.

Won't take you long to adjust at all as they're very similar and the apps are more lightweight and faster than Adobe's products have ever been. Also iPad versions if you want to edit on a tablet.

Been using Affinity Photo for a while now as an alternative to Photoshop and wouldn't look back.

How does Affinity Photo compare with Pixelmator Pro? I'm trying to pick between the two.

I've never used Pixelmator, but Pixelmator is Mac Only where Affinity works on Windows too.

I tried both. Pixelmator lacked (or I couldn’t find) vector tools I was looking for at the time, then the trial expired. That pushed me to Affinity and I had less trouble. Take this with a grain of salt, but vector work feels like a bit of an afterthought with Pixelmator.

I lost my adobe license from my old job and gave designer a go. For my purposes, I’ve found it to be a superior solution. Runs faster, and basically the same shortcuts.

I’ve used Affinity Designer as a cheap alternative to Illustrator. Not surprisingly it’s way better than Inkscape (the Inkscape UI alone makes me lose all interests in designing anything), but Illustrator definitely has a lot more features and power tools, and arguably more importantly, a hell lot more online resources. So I guess Affinity Designer fulfills the role as a budget alternative, but not much more.

I've always wondered why the space of professional graphics programs isn't like the space of professional DAW (audio) programs. With DAWs, everything is a standardized plugin (a VST) that can be run inside any of the workstation programs. Customers can buy VSTs separately from any consideration of what ecosystem they're going to be using them with.

I have no experience with graphic design programs, but I would guess that it has something to do with the fact that VSTs are self contained and have extremely simple interfaces. A VST takes some input (MIDI or audio) and produces some output (MIDI or audio). That's it. They're extremely modular, and you can chain them together in arbitrary ways so long as the inputs/outputs line up.

I imagine it's not so simple in the graphic design world, and without such a simple interface that everyone can agree on, it's much harder to create standardized plugins that everyone can use.

Because only now are viable professional alternatives to Adobe programs starting to show up. Adobe would be shooting themselves in the foot by working with some interoperable plugin format. Also, for graphic design at least, plugins are a much smaller part of your workflow than they are in audio production— the basic tools really are the most important thing in design. I'd say most professional graphic designers, if absolutely necessary, could replace their entire digital workflow with a few hundred dollars in art supplies, maybe minus typesetting and color matching functionality, and likely produce more interesting (if much slower and less polished) results. I don't even think they make Letraset letters anymore.

Come to think of it, one of the most important graphical resources we have is even more interchangeable than VST plugins— fonts.

That's very true! Although, I don't think it used to be true; there used to be several different, incompatible font systems. There were many simple bitmap-font formats for operating systems/display protocols (Windows, MacOS, and X11 all had their own); and then there were more complex, vector font formats, originally designed for printers to use internally, but then extended to computers through desktop-publishing software (e.g. Adobe Type1, Apple TrueType.)

If you think about it, much of the original point of desktop-publishing software, back when OSes could only natively use bitmap fonts, was that desktop-publishing software could do WYSIWYG layout and preview-rendering for vector-font "instructions" (e.g. PostScript.) Fonts were indeed a lot like VSTs!

Do you do any digital painting? That's a large component of photoshop for me, although lately its been sharing with Procreate.

Have you checked out Adobe Fresco? It's a free app that works for iPad and Windows, and let's you draw/paint in Fresco and use that same document in Photoshop

I use procreate on ipad.

For windows I'm done with adobe. I'm not looking for an alternative to photoshop to stick with the company that made me leave photoshop.

I needed to do some water color recently. Corel Painter blew my mind. The interface looks a little outdated but the brush styles and effects out of the box are just a joy to use.

I own Corel Painter 2019 but it hasn't been very stable for me. Lately I've been doing my digital work on an ipad pro on procreate.

Affinity Photo literally freezes trying to open 5-10 raw files taken with a Nikon camera.

Pathetic. I tried to get a refund, oops buying through Apple's App Store makes that impossible.

What iPad are you using?

RAW files are more a lightroom thing from what I've heard

Yes! I also switch to all of the Affinity apps in addition to Capture One.

I am looking to replace Adobe because 50 USD per month is quite a number. I prefer one time price like Affinity. Too bad they don't have replacement for Premiere Pro and After Effects. For now I'm stuck in Adobe's purgatory.

You probably already have, but DaVinci Resolve is worth a try

For Premiere Pro, did you take a look at Final Cut Pro X? Sure it's mac only, but it ticks all the other boxes

Know any Premiere Pro alternatives? I know nothing about videos except we pay $70 a month and Premiere Pro still can't edit our older iPhone videos because they were filmed without a certain compatibility setting turned on for the phone.

We have to run an older (years older) Premiere Pro on our Macbook that somehow can edit them without any issues at all, with a newer up-to-date version on our much faster PC for recent videos. We've tried transcoding and various things like using an older version on Windows, but nothing else seems to work.

Then the other day I had to stay up until 3am because a video being edited just stopped saving with an uncaught exception and no useful information on both versions. I finally figured out that some effects like loudness and reverb control applied to the sound channel had become corrupted (after noticing it would save with sound off, then fiddling with the clips for another 2 hours having no idea what I'm doing).

Ever since the Flash days I've been wary of their software quality. Paying over $800 per year is fair if you're earning money and the stuff just works, but they don't seem to be holding up their end of the bargain.

DaVinci Resolve is worth a look and is a one time licence. Also, there is a free version.

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/

For transcoding your footage nothing but the best, FFmpeg:

https://ffmpeg.org/

However, if you don't need the absolutely full array of switches available in FFmpeg, Ive used the fork FFmbc to get into standard broadcast formats with easy presets:

https://github.com/bcoudurier/FFmbc

Thanks, I've heard of DaVinci Resolve and found out shortly after commenting that there is a free version. We should give it a try.

I've got ffmpeg and Handbrake for transcoding but for some reason they both caused issues in Premiere Pro still (audio sync, choppy/repeating footage, etc) on those files. I'm not very experienced, so that might be on me, but it didn't seem to happen outside of Premiere Pro.

FCP X?

Best if it works on Windows, our Windows PCs are quite a bit more powerful.

I just made the switch for exactly this reason! Still getting the hang of the UI but seems promising so far. I shoot with Fuji cameras which seem well-supported here.

a bit off-topic, but would you have any interest in a barely-used FUJIFILM XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro. and also a FUJIFILM XF 1.4x TC WR Teleconverter.

my Fujifilm XT2 was stolen during a trip to Europe last year and i've switched back to Nikon since the battery life of the mirrorless was disappointing (due to the EVF).

now i have some Fujinon macro glass collecting dust as rather expensive paperweights :(

https://www.reddit.com/r/photomarket/

Check out Darktable, too!

I learned on Darktable as an amateur using Youtube tutorials and absolutely love it. I really "get" the concept of the digital darkroom now, and I love the conscious effort of "developing" my photos.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com