Elon Musk Wins. Tesla Can Reopen Its Factory
barrons.com
barrons.com
More generally, I find the "we'll just ignore laws we find inconvenient and disagree with" approach a lot of SV (Uber springs to mind) or SV derived companies have taken discomforting. Rule of law is important and defiance should be reserved for true injustice, not self-enrichment.
Also worth noting that he got support from government officials, including the state governor.
https://www.tesla.com/blog/getting-back-work
https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/blog_attachments/T... (Warning: PDF)
This doesn't match what the workers themselves are saying:
https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/11/21254871/tesla-fremont-sh...
https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21256665/tesla-reopens-ne...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/12/tesla-wor...
> These measure were implemented and tested at the Shanghai Gigafactory
It's interesting. Elon's been keen on tweeting about American freedoms lately. I wonder when he'll do the same for Chinese freedoms.
[1] https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr748/BILLS-116hr748enr.p... (Warning: PDF)
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/article/coronavirus-stimulus-package... (Control-f "Unemployment Benefits")
SpaceX is currently asking for government handouts:
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-05-12/spacex-mus...
There's no honest fight for truth, justice, and the American way in anything Elon is doing. It's just a company trying to get what it can and give as little as possible back.
Socialize the costs, privatize the profits.
Did we forget the Federal Reserve is dumping hundreds of billions of dollars into the bond markets to prop up Boeing [1], Ford [2], and other exceptionally poorly run entrenched businesses who were lucky enough to have large amounts of debt issued?
[1] https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/the-non-bailout-how-...
[2] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/surging-ford-bonds-lead-credi...
Elon whining about public health measures being "fascist", threatening to leave California, and then going cap in hand for more public money from the state he claims is limiting his "freedoms" is not just a bad joke, it's farcical.
When you are an innovator, you get some latitude to shit post. The public may not look fondly upon your antics, but shareholders have stood behind Musk (and if results continue, will likely continue to do so). California needs Tesla and SpaceX more than they need California. The rest of the world (China, Germany for Gigafactories, several countries have begged for one), and other states (Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Colorado all have incentives to Tesla on offer), have shown they're willing to accommodate. No one is rushing to do the same for failing behemoths such as Boeing and Ford (both of whom are performing substantial layoffs, [1] [2]).
There is a balance to be struck between operational flexibility and public safety. IMHO, Alameda County overreached.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23021873
[2] https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/02/11/ford-f11.html
If you were doing these things, I'd support you. But you're not. Most aren't. I support those that are doing this work, necessary work. Elon would not be my first pick, but unfortunately, he’s the only pick at this scale. "The Devil You Know."
They don't and never will align. He is a narcissistic attention-seeker. You don't figure into that.
The excuses you're making for him are embarrassing.
If California wants to spend money on training people for new jobs and SpaceX participates then the funds are being spent exactly the way the government wants and achieving the government's objectives (increased employment).
California also wants to subsidize electric cars in order to have less pollution and Tesla makes such cars. Those subsidies are being spent by the government and accomplishing government goals.
This in no way obligates Elon or his companies to support government policy in other areas.
In most cases, the counties compete against each other, trying to host bigger and more expensive companies within them. Amazon proved the model when they were competing in 20+ cities for HQ2... and all the cities tried to offer lower and lower taxes to Amazon.
Same thing here. Tesla just makes a few threats about leaving the county, and then the county capitulates. Ultimately, these companies have the power to change the counties that host them. Even in open defiance of the law.
I find it hard to blame the citizens of Alameda for not respecting the rule of law when Alameda brags about being a sanctuary city.
It is. But it's also important that the rule of law not become tyrannical and oppressive. This is all the more reason that it's very important to put many checks and balances and deadlocks in the legislative process to greatly limit the degree to which it can become tyrannical. Preventing tyranny is a key prerequisite to getting members of society to respect the rule of law.
If the laws were just inconvenient, Alameda wouldn't have given in. They are wrong and destructive and there's little reason for them other than putting authorities in a cosy spot (lockdown means nobody can blame authorities for casualties) while everyone else has to suffer.
It's stunning though how many people will just switch off their brains and chime in with the fearmongering when they get scared and instinctively turn to authorities for help, rationalizing their measures, however meaningless they may be.
The County has been in negotiations with Tesla to reopen on May 18th, provided Tesla follows the guidelines, and working with Tesla on a re-opening plan to ensure the safety of its workers.
The Tesla factory will be allowed to reopen on May 18th, as planned.
Musk's tantrum was entirely unnecessary in the first place, but also it was ineffective. Don't give in to the narrative that glorifies the hissy fit theatrics of this particular narcissist.
A better title: Alameda county doesn't fall into Musk's martyr trap[2].
Sources: [1][2]
>Scott Haggerty, the county supervisor for the district in Alameda County where Tesla’s Fremont plant is located, said on Saturday that he had been confident that county health officials and Tesla executives were close to an agreement on reopening the plant on May 18[1]
[1]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/09/business/coronavirus-elon...
[2]https://electrek.co/2020/05/12/tesla-fremont-factory-alameda...