Google at their best. Facebook at their best.
bryce.vc
bryce.vc
Google started launching their great non-search products (maps, mail) around 2004-2005 when it was at the same age as Facebook is today. And these products were or turned out to be supportive to their core search business as well. There were another couple of years before we've seen some great technologies from Google which weren't supposed to support their search business. So please, give Facebook couple more years before you judge.
Technical problems that Facebook solves in building and scaling their platform are enough challenging to require and attract the best minds in the industry. Let's see what these people will do when the dust settles a bit.
That said, I'm across the globe from the action and know nothing about these companies culture or attitude. But I still wouldn't judge Facebook yet.
Facebook in contrast seems desperate to retain users. Nothing they create is useful without a Facebook account. Rather than pushing out the best products they can, they rely on the strength of vendor lock-in as a crutch.
I'm not even saying this is necessarily the result of some evil plan to take over the web. It's just that when you have the kind of lock-in they have you're loathe to give it up, and it makes you lazy since there are lots of places where you have nothing to measure yourself against but your previous performance.
As well they should be. Born by, and live by, the social network, die by the social network. "You still using the old Facebook?" said with derision by the cool kids is probably what echos in their nightmares. Not the name Diaspora.
Google has a wide range of services in multiple fields, while Facebook has a single product, a social networking platform.
I still hate Facebook though.