I'm a big fan of that series, mostly because we agree on just about everything. Especially how people tend to get carried away with 'the 4% rule', which is more than a rule-of-thumb than anything.
The thing that's most different about my strategy is that it doesn't have a 'memory' of what your past retirement income was. Put simply, you retire every 3 months. A lot of folks get nervous when I say this but in practice, this is in fact how most people behave.
For example, consider the case of someone who unfortunately retired just before the COVID crash. Strategies that have a 'memory' intrinsically offer some assurance that you'll probably weather the downturn without decreasing your lifestyle very much. In practice, most folks will 'start over' their retirement just to be safe and reset the memory of their prior payments. In my opinion, if you're not going to trust the assurances of a given strategy then what good is it?
Another thing that sets my strategy apart is that it focuses on capital depletion. Most strategies don't have any sort of annuity component and this typically resorts in a binary outcome near the end of the investment horizon -- you're either filthy rich or you went bankrupt years ago (both of these are bad outcomes for me). My strategy is constantly readjusting itself so that you exhaust your savings around 100 years old (or whatever age you set the formula to). This results in better overall effective utilization of savings.
I could go on but those are the two biggest things.