The Office Is Dead
marker.medium.com
marker.medium.com
There is a subset of each of these subsets that seems to be completely unaware that the other "side" exists.
This article seems to be written from the perspective of a person unaware of the subset of people that are just straight up bad at working from home.
(The same subsets also exist for companies instead of people.)
P.S.: Of course, by the same logic, forcing people who are bad at working in an office to do so regardless is dumb too.
As a new grad (hoping that my job offer survives covid), I'm terrified of a transition where WFH is the default. I recognize that I still have a lot to learn, and that I can't do it all on my own. Casual interactions with coworkers and the ability to passively absorb new information in the workplace are essential for entry-level employees like me. Plus, personally, I find the social aspect of work to be crucial to my well-being.
The one thing that probably _doesn't_ affect this is a past pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic may push some companies to improve their workflows for working from home, but, the workflows are only one thing out of a whole bunch.
I would expect maybe a few more percent of people working from home after the pandemic is over. Hopefully those would be people that are good at working from home but couldn't do so previously for some reason. It'll also happen to some people who are bad at it, but either need time to realize it, or are forced into it since the company thinks it's better or saves money.
But overall... we're still the same people after COVID-19. I don't see the office dying any time soon.
I work from my small kitchen table that is about four feet from my couch which is about 7-8 feet from my bed. This makes it a lot harder to get into the work zone, as well, it makes it harder to leave it at the end of the day.
Secondly, a lot of my older team members are married or live with a significant other.
I on the other hand live by myself in a new city where the only people I know are the ones that are on my team. Or, were on my team, I should say, before my company internally shuffled roles to avoid layoffs and moved me from my analyst role that I was in for about six months (my first job out of college) down to support. So now the only people I talk to are people calling for help. Or my parents by video call. Other than that it’s just me and my thoughts, which makes it a lot more difficult mentally. I don’t have a spouse or significant other to talk to throughout the day, and the only people I do talk to, for 8 hours, are generally in a neutral to unhappy mood, which also does nothing good for my mental health. Which is just adding on top of the effect being moved from the role I went to college for, and I applied for, and that I thought would help get me on the right path for my career goals (data engineer), down to a support role less technical than the one I had as an internship during college, had on me.
I’m applying for data analyst/BI/Junior DBA/Junior Data Engineer roles across the western US, but I have a feeling it will be quite hard now with lots of experienced workers being laid off competing for lower level jobs, considering I only have six months real world experience. As well, I want to start a project for my portfolio to help learn some key technologies I don’t know, but I’m generally so mentally drained after work I just don’t want to do anything. I just want to nap or zone out. I took Friday and today off but it doesn’t feel even close to enough time to fully recharge.
I’m rambling off subject, but yeah, as you can tell, this entire thing has definitely not been easy on some of us. I think I’d like WFH if it was an option, as in, Monday and Friday WFH, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, I’m in the office. That would be a good balance for me.
I can’t imagine how bad this would have been if my wife and I had still been living in our apartment. Even then I had a separate small office and we had a treadmill in the living room.
This is in a relatively low cost of living area. So I’m definitely not bragging.
But now, it’s not too bad. I have a large separate office, we have one bedroom converted into a decently equipped gym with exercise equipment, my son has his own room, my wife converted another room that was originally her study to an ad-hoc studio so she could continue to teach her fitness classes.
That being said, perhaps with all the seniors working at home there might be more chance for interaction with them while also at home?
I'm liking working from home a lot, but it's okay and should be acknowledged that some people work better in the office.
Absent some external force (like, say, legislation, or a union), why would companies care that there are a subset of people who are $17,000 more expensive for the same output?
Maybe a limited number of small, closed offices, rather than a desk for every employee in an open-space will be the new norm, maybe companies will buy employees equipment to accommodate them at home?
Some will just ignore COVID wherever they possibly can, but I think most won't.
Given the current working conditions, I'm getting better at the prior from home. But I know people that literally cannot function this way, and I know others who never come to the office.
Companies will completely disregard this information and will base the amount of office space and WFH policies based on the cost of real estate post COVID19.
I predict that when the virus situation calms down, companies will tend to prefer WFH policies until some companies start noticing how cheap office leases are. At that point, we'll ramp back up to where we are today for the same bogus reasons we have open office plans and lots of butts in seats.
I also predict that there will be a bubble of architecture changes for new housing builds: single family homes (that often have a home office space) will start to be built with 2 home offices to support married couples both working from home.
In the future, we'll have way more jobs for these people as companies see the advantages in cost when hiring someone who will be happy to make less money and produce more because they a)don't need to live in the bay area, b)don't need to commute and c)don't get distracted all the time.
This said, I find it very unlikely that software office jobs will disappear or even reduce drastically. I'm predicting a 30% reduction in full-office jobs, not a 90% reduction. Despite all of the excitement for future WFH opportunities, remember old habits die hard.
With social distancing, there's literally no reason to not surround employee workspaces with tall cube walls, besides a desire to replace personal privacy with distraction.
[1] For a good discussion of this, see Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams.
Open offices are cheap. Re-configuring office space isn't cheap. So, no.
Some places are probably still hot-desking.
I think that's pre-covid thinking. The OP speaks about 1) companies dropping their office footprints due to increased WFH and 2) companies reducing office density and making other changes to accommodate social distancing. Both of those require office reconfiguration.
We'll be dealing with this pandemic for at least another year, and the psychological effects will last longer, so monomaniacal bottom-line focused thinking will have to accommodate it.
So I'm not so sure the office is dead. As someone else pointed out, this might be true for some people but we may still need office space for the other portion of the population.
My god, is that what it costs now?! You can rent an 1800 sq ft house in the middle of SF for about $7,000 a month. You'd get three "offices", some common space, a kitchen, some parking. You could spend another $2,000 a month to hire someone to clean the place every day, and another $2,000 to have someone bring coffee and beer and whatever else you get "for free" at WeWork, and even $1,000 a month for an "IT person" so set up and maintain wifi and conferencing equipment, and still save money.
It is not until this pandemic that I was forced to work from home that I realized that I am the happiest I've ever been in years. I always felt tired daily when I used to go to office and also go to bunch of other social gatherings that I have. It turns out that I am definitely an introvert to the bone. Not only not meeting people everyday face to face has been beneficial to me, but cutting slack, social media, text, etc has been tremendously great for me. I also don't watch TV. Basically less human interaction in general (not zero at all mind you, I'm not anti social). Now I have more time to cultivate my various hobbies (which I've always been doing anyway) and become self absorbed lol.
I enjoy life better now, everyday feel fresh and energized and as a result my productivity with my work also shoot through the roof. I didn't know why I always thought I'd be distracted at home. All the simple things in life like running outside, walking outside, queueing for some snacks, just become delightful all of a sudden. Not to mention the great air quality.
I know it is bad for me to say this, but this pandemic I've been the happiest in years. I hope this pandemic is over soon but I don't hope to be back in office soon.
I have a 9-month old baby who is just starting to crawl all over the place and gets noisy and impatient when we don't pay attention to her. My wife and I work during office hours. Nursery is of course out of the question due to the lockdown and babysitters are illegal (because of the quarantine). Our stress levels are going through the roof. I want to go back to normality ASAP. Give me back my office, please!
The reality is that if a company says they don’t need an office because you can work from home, they need to compensate you for the use of your office space. A place of work is physical capital, and you can’t simply decide that your workers provide that capital as part of their employment.
Why not? I suppose it depends on the contract you signed when you were hired.
Back in the day when cell phones were new, companies provided them to you.
Now they just assume you have one.
Things that start out as work provided sometimes move into employer provided without extra compensation.
2. My company has been leaning heavily into not just open office space, but what they call freestyle office space. They only allocate enough desk space for 50-75% of the people working in the building with the assumption that people will be in meetings or elsewhere for enough of the day to make it work out. You do not have an assigned desk and are not allowed to sit at a certain desk for more than 2 hours. (Yes, many/most of us think this is the height of stupidity - it's like being back in college and everyone is working in the library and you have to have a backpack to carry all your stuff from place to place). Of course, this whole seating arrangement is a nightmare in a social distancing situation. What they are saying now is that when we go back you can sit at a desk the whole day, but every other desk must be empty. So, intead of having enough desks for 50-75% of people, there will only be enough for 25-37.5% of people. Clearly they are going to have to allow working from home to continue for a certain percentage of people. I'm honestly not sure how they is all going to shake out.
There are plenty of people who didn't like working from home before and still don't. There are also plenty of people who just can't do their job as well from home.
What seems likely is that some managers who previously didn't think of work-from-home as a viable option before will probably be more open to the idea going forward. And some individual contributors will decide that working remotely suits them well. And companies will have a better sense of the tools required for effectively working remotely.
But the majority of people are going back to the office when this is over. It might be because managers will still be managers, and feel that they can have more control with people there in person. It might be because people like to get out of the home. Maybe they like socializing with coworkers in person. Maybe they don't have enough room at home. Or the proper equipment.
I certainly expect to see changes, but the concept of offices isn't going anywhere.
[1] and nor does the article claim it is, despite the sensationalist headline
First will be trendy tech organizations that will go the extreme and set a large window of WFH, then some will move a large chunk of operations to WFH, then a lot of tech companies will follow with bold claims of how good it is, and so on...
Then all of a sudden, one study or one article with the unpopular opinion - "working from home is not that good after all", then some people will vent out on how they dislike it in some situations, then one trendy company will make the bold claim: "We're bringing people back in!"
I can already see the headlines of Buzzfeed, Wired, and posts on medium: "The gold nugget of productivity! This company boosted their performance by bringing people back into what we used to call offices!", with comments of the CEO that's trying to lure in talent.
Just to end back in the middle term: some roles are suitable for work from home, while others make sense to bring in house, some people prefer work from home while others don't.
My prediction is this will all occur until 2022.
Just to make it clear: I like working from home.
my hope is that, after seeing that work still got done during the crisis, employers will be more willing to entertain a certain number of WFH days per week. this would be ideal for me. I love the flexibility and comfort of WFH, but I would like to have at least a small window where I can reliably find people on-site for a face-to-face meeting, without having to plan that interaction far in advance.
Each job since then the number of required trips seems to drop a little. I think I'm pretty much permanently always home now. I really don't get sick any more.
I know it hasn't really hit specific articles, but NO, nail salons are not the cause of the pandemic. The specific cause of the pandemic was airplanes (or travelling in general) and offices, which quite aptly explains new york on both counts.
I’d rather live in a cheap apartment further out that had parking for a car so I could drive to the mountains or just anywhere really. Instead I’ve been within probably a quarter mile of my apartment at all times for the last ten weeks. I’m paying a premium for no return right now.
Now that I have remote work experience, everyone else does as well. So... no change in my competitive position vis-à-vis other remote job candidates. Booo, they'll just come up with new reasons to reject me :(
I like working from home, there are some disadvantages, but overall I definitely prefer it, and at a more macro level I think there's an opportunity here to fix some of the crowding issues (not to mention traffic and the concomitant pollution) in our cities by giving people flexibility in where they live and work. I for one, hate big cities, but a career in tech has generally meant living in a major metro area.
OTOH, companies are not going to just let all the office space they're paying for sit idle. If they can't divest themselves of some/most of it quickly (hello, commercial real-estate crash), all our asses are going to be back in our rickety office chairs under the flickering fluorescent lights.
I get it; you're super productive in your job during this pandemic but is this the same thing? It feels more like optimizing for efficiency in what you do now, vs. effectiveness to do something bigger than yourself.
I manage a lot of people who focus on making themselves x% better, where x ranges from 1% to maybe 15%. I believe to scale we need to make the system better, which is more like a fractional % improvement multipled by n. Is this easier to do remotely? not yet with the tools we have IME...
Working from home just doesn't work that well if you're on a team. The constant communication with the other team members helps a great deal. For example, you can bring along the new guys and get them up to speed on how things work and what to do. Misunderstandings don't fester into disasters. Somebody veering off in the wrong direction can be quickly brought back to focus on the team goal.
In the past, when I WFH, and everybody else is in the office. I was the odd one out and people start to talk amongst themselvces. Sometimes I don't hear well, sometimes I can't get into the discussion politely.
But, since everybody is WFH right now, the whole WFH experience became better and I am more productive in WFH as a result.
If a new WeWork manages "subdivided office space" all around a city, then a company could lease space from all of them, and pay just slightly more than they used to, with the freedom that their employees can spend more time at the office because commuting is less of a chore. Supplement that with all the luxury add-ons and suddenly it looks like the office is reborn, not dead at all.
And remember: cities are getting bigger, not smaller. Why not rent an apartment in the same skyscraper as a coworking space, along with your co-workers who also live in your city? Especially if your job sets aside money to help pay for it? Again you can squeeze "more productivity" out of your little mechanical turks, but you don't have to deal with the management overhead of typical offices. Less logistics, more productivity, still (basically) an office.
We're thick in the middle of a pandemic right now. It will subside. No one knows exactly what waits for us on the other side, or what the societal impacts will be. Yes, we're all working remotely right now. But it's been an incredibly slap-dash, thrown together effort for many companies and that might mean they become less receptive to remote work in the future, not more. We don't really have any data on what the economic impact of remote work is (separate from all the other economic impacts swirling around us right now), and until we do I'm going to hold off making too many wild predictions.
Except for the 33 million people out of jobs in the last 6 weeks.
To be fair it _kinda_ makes sense in that each person will have their own preference for tools, but it's a pretty big expense.
BYO monitor/keyboard/etc will of course be possible, but also I would expect a startup budget for most places.
Companies that make consumables like toilet paper and soap will have to scale their residential arms and reduce their commercial arms, which in some instances requires building entire new paper mills or production facilities.
Gas, electricity, and water utilities will all see "weekend all day" patterns that they'll need to adjust for. Internet providers might start offering commercial-light plans for home offices that come with an SLA but not full business support.
* they can save a ton of money by using less office space per person going forward, and
* so far, they are seeing equal or better productivity from remote employees, as this article points out.
The question answers itself, I think.
--
[a] That's the estimated value of office space in the US: https://www.reit.com/data-research/research/nareit-research/...
But our CEO hates remote work. Upper management is already talking about getting some people back in the office in a few weeks. It's a bit depressing.
Same story with mine. (Minus the business booming - ours is fluttering along)
I've brought this up to our management: "We work in a space where most people sit within arms distance of each other. How are you going to manage that aspect?"
They said, "Oh, maybe we'll do a thing where half comes in one day and half comes in another. Like business one day, engineering another, etc."
I responded, "But... the office isn't setup for hot swapping desks at all. So, you'd have half of some teams come in? You'd force us all in small meeting rooms again with very poor ventilation where we can't do social distancing? What's the point if half of engineering is at home and half isn't? We don't have many bathrooms so we'd have a lot of shared touch points. Same with kitchen - etc."
As usual - they're not thinking past the initial words coming out of their mouth. It's utterly amazing how inept people are at all levels of the stack.
Or, will they discover what IBM discovered decades ago, that work-from-home saves $$millions on otherwise unnecessary office space. They've long had both work-from-home, and a temp office setup where you sign up where you'll need an office that day, go to the location, get assigned a desk, and everything routes to that location/desk. I've had a fam member working for them from home for nearly 20yrs.
Sure, managers may like the control of walking down the hall and standing over any employee when they feel like it.
But I expect that they'll like even better not having to spend insane commercial real estate costs, hear every worker complain about traffic, only to see lower net productivity...
(Edit: I'm assuming this must be a different IBM division from the one in which my family member works, which has see no change in her work-from-home status, even tho the article says 'IBM cancelled it'.)
Ultimately the biggest takeaway from this WFH situation might just make it clearer which employers are worth a spit, and which ones genuinely don't care about their employees.
the issue with work from home is that jobs which are suited for it or can be adapted this require that workers have discipline to do so. for companies willing to have a portion of their employees offsite then HR programs would need to be put into place to help train people how to manage their work life at home and then to train managers in how to properly employ a work from home team.
the issue not raised here is the tax component. a collapse of the real estate market will take the tax base down a few notches. this will lead to an increase in finding a replacement and this could include proxy taxes on an employees work from home setup and costs associated with it; a few fees and tariffs here and there. Then comes the non state actors, HOAs and property management companies, whose rules will need to moderated if not outright regulated to prevent putting undue pressure on work from home employees. most can fly under the RADAR because of no increase in external activity; think shipping and receiving; to give it away but cancel culture has its adherents everywhere with people who have nothing better to do than point.
It’s not a question of if there is about to be a bloodbath in commercial real estate, just how bad it’s going to be.
If there’s a plus side smart developers could quickly repurpose commercial spaces into residential and quickly fill needed housing shortages in many cities.
That is absolutely absurd. $25,000 for an amount of space equivalent to a large 2 bedroom apartment? If this is what kind of rates restaurants are paying for rent, I can imagine why their margins are razor thin.
Excuse me, but WAT
Problem I have with that is after the dot bomb we were looking at office space and it seemed that the high flyers that threw $$$[1] at their office build outs were all out of business. Where the ones where you had as a friends company, network cables stapled to the walls weren't.
It's not so much the money spent but the thought that those were the guys that didn't have a sense of how to prioritize their cash flow.
[1] Like 100-300 sqft on build out.
IMHO many people will actually revert back to their old behaviors for the simple reason that offices are still there and as restrictions lift in the next weeks there will be lots of pressure to show up on people.
What will take longer is changing processes to facilitate working remotely. Many smarter companies are probably looking to make this a permanent thing in their companies; because it makes sense and it undeniably can work. For developers it's easy, just do what the OSS folk are doing for the last decades; it works. And the stuff they were doing instead always was in any case a bit challenged in terms of actually working as advertised.
However, the rest of the world will need a bit longer to discover how to work asynchronously.
Also there's the notion that a lot of work is actually completely redundant and pointless. Big corporations are just as bad about generating bureaucracy as governments are. Fat profits can cover up a lot of bad management. A cynical reason for remote work not being much of a disruption is that lots of people weren't actually doing anything important anyway. So, them doing a poor job of something that never mattered to begin with is completely OK. Of course the next logical step is getting smarter about eliminating such jobs. A curious thing in today's economy is that this does not seem to happen nearly as often as you'd expect. Rather the opposite and people self congratulate each other to ever more surreal levels of dysfunctional behavior.
In any case, seeing a productivity boost if you eliminate 1-2 hour (twice per day) commutes at stupid o'clock from people's life should not come as a surprise. Being well rested and non stressed does wonders for people's focus and concentration.
A lot of people come to office not just to work but it’s also some sort of essential social gathering for them. This is more true for those extroverted by nature.
Something to consider, though: Most employees today probably aren't compensated for the time and money they waste during their daily commute. What about car maintenance? Unless they're driving a company car to work most employees will have to pay for that themselves. Shouldn't the employer cover or reimburse these costs?
Do you want to have someone who lives next to work get the job rather than you because he won't have commute costs? Be careful about unintended consequences.
If you believe you are worth more money, negotiate for that.
But practically speaking, it would not be surprising to see WFH companies offer slightly higher salaries largely due to the significant savings associated with no offices, as well as the reduced risk of not having a lease. If I save $27K a year per employee (from the article), I can easily offer candidates $10K more than my competitors with an office, increasing profit and attracting higher quality talent.
Seems like fungible costs
Also seems different depending if it is a laptop, vs trilpe-workstation-10 screen setup?
When working on my own, I charge clients for travel costs or build it into their pricing.
If you're an employee, AFAIK the company is also required to cover some costs, but I don't remember what exactly & under what conditions...
Your salary has been reduced by 20% due to the recession. On the positive side, we will now give you a 3% raise to cover your home office sorts.
Sincerely Management
I'm sure that I can find a company that wouldn't require any of these, but the salary and benefits from my current job outweigh these costs.
My clothes have nothing to do with my employer, nor does my car, even if I use them while working, I can also use them for other things.
It's the employer's responsibility to create the space for working. Currently we're all basically loaning our bosses some space in our homes. If everyone's boss goes "huh well, guess I don't need a physical office anymore" then all they've done is offload the responsibility for housing their work to their employees, with no compensation.
- Expense Budget for tech upgrades (desk, hardware, etc). Probably a few hundred dollars a month per employee once you do the math.
- Or maybe Directly boost salaries by a similar amount?
- Throw a bumping annual all expense paid off-site trip with the $$$ not spent on rent
Far from being able to implement it given a long term lease but I’d really be surprised if a company dropped its real estate footprint and not pass some perk or benefit onto the employees.Also in most cases work that is done at home is done in on a computer, so the same space that is used for home computer use can be reused at no additional space cost besides possibly an extra desktop or laptop if a dedicated machine is used.
my employer does not reimburse home office expenses, but several of my friends work for employers that do. the way it works for them is that they get a yearly "technology" budget of about $1000-2000. then they can spend it on any equipment they want to use at home or in the office. as long as it's some sort of computer hardware or office furniture, no questions are asked.
That's basically just a $1000 bump in your salary. The fiction that you're getting an extra technology benefit is just that, a fiction.
From a pragmatic point of view, and an accounting one (for the employer), your "benefits" are taken from your salary. The only time those benefits are worth it for the employer is if it pays for something pre-tax rather than post-tax (health care falls into this category, hence the popularity of employer provided health care).
The accounting term for this is "total employee compensation". That's what matters to the employer when calculating the cost/benefit of an employee.
Be careful what you ask for in benefits. They can be expensive for the employee.
That does happen a lot with expense reports. They get abused all the time. Sometimes, though, employees do get their ERs audited, and get fired for ER fraud. Especially if the employer needs a reason to fire you.