How does the fact that people criticized the memo without reading it in full speak to OP's point about the memo having been taken out of context?

I'll also suggest, reading this memo was incredibly painful for many of my female colleagues and friends inside and outside of Google. I don't think they should have to read the entire thing carefully in order to have an opinion on it. Indeed, I am not a well-read expert in many schools of thought that I nonetheless object to.

> Worth noting the first couple outlets (Vice, Gizmodo) did not post the full memo when they dropped the story.

OP's claim was that this was intentional with the goal of creating sensational clickbait. I guess the idea is, the full memo was tamer and, had it not been excerpted, people would not have reacted as strongly.

Do you agree with this?