Musk: Tesla will 'immediately' leave California over coronavirus shutdowns
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
It's dangerous how prone he is to fashioning himself to be an authority on things he knows nothing about.
If you're going to claim Musk isn't an engineer then you're defining the term so narrowly it stops being interesting. Biographies of him are quite clear that when he decided to make SpaceX he spent a very long period of time indeed doing nothing but reading rocket science textbooks; it was the knowledge of rocketry he gained by doing that which allowed him to realise which problems needed to be solved, that they could be solved, who could do the work to solve them and most importantly to gain the confidence of other rocket engine designers and convince them to join him. He pretty routinely engages in technical discussion about rockets, what happened, what went wrong etc.
That's on top of his experience as a software developer.
So if you're going to claim Musk isn't an engineer then really neither was Bill Gates, Larry Page, or other people who did some initial work and had some expertise in what their company did but rapidly became a professional executive.
>Elon Reeve Musk FRS (/ˈiːlɒn/; born June 28, 1971) is an engineer, industrial designer, technology entrepreneur, scientist and philanthropist
Still haters gonna hate.
To be fair and pedantic, he's proven expertise in broad areas. Regardless, I agree with your last point.
As far as I know it's mostly VC and some product design leadership.
https://www.quora.com/Does-Elon-Musk-do-some-very-technical-...
There's more examples from interviews with people at SpaceX on YouTube I can't find right now. Web development and rocket science are two very different domains.
We'll probably have some more data as places start to reopen.
The frustration (and venting) is perhaps understandable, but it's not a good look to be begging for special treatment. Hundreds of bay area folks are currently in the ICU with COVID-19. A bit of carelessness or bad luck and those hundreds will become (tens of) thousands.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/05/09/us/coronaviru...
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2020/05/07/new-sur...
33% are from nursing homes:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/05/09/us/coronaviru...
• The huge numbers dying of what would otherwise be called old age who simply happen to test positive at the moment of death.
• The financial incentives hospitals are given to code deaths as COVID.
• The rampant reporting of COVID without tests based on nothing more than suspicion (combine that with the second point)
At this point the death counts for COVID around the world are so corrupted they're basically meaningless.
Dont forget that testing for COVID is basically impossible for an asymptomatic person here in the US.
Adding a source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronav...
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronav...
There are two figures being widely reported for deaths:
1. Total excess mortality of all causes
2. "COVID deaths"
The claim was about (2) and so that's what my points were about.
Excess death is up, yes. There's a disease, it does cause people to die, especially if they're already vulnerable.
Arguments about the all cause mortality spikes are different and not related to the arguments for over-counting of "COVID deaths", which isn't a conspiracy theory but rather actual stated government policy [1]. The figure for "COVID deaths" includes cases where it's merely assumed that the death was caused by COVID. No test or even evidence need be cited. If doctors are completely reliable this wouldn't be a problem, but they get a 20% payment incentive when patients are claimed to be COVID patients [2].
If you're curious about the arguments surrounding all-cause mortality, the problem is that stay-at-home orders have been taken very literally by many sick people. Hospital admissions went down, not up, during this time, because people who should have been going to the emergency room for treatment got scared and stayed away. In the UK, the government just dropped the "stay at home" slogan it's been relentlessly promoting for weeks because - amongst other things - cardiac admissions halved, and doctors are now sounding the alarm about the huge oncoming wave of necessary life-saving treatments that were delayed in the expectation of a COVID surge that never happened. The NHS can't absorb a huge wave like that, because the needed treatments are so varied so you can't just throw up uniform field hospitals like they tried for COVID. In the UK the ONS is already reporting thousands of excess deaths not linked to COVID [3] even though being "linked to COVID" literally requires no evidence at all.
There are very real problems here.
[1] https://twitter.com/alexberenson/status/1246124190438227974?...
[2] https://twitter.com/alexberenson/status/1251898539107594244?...
[3] https://medium.com/wintoncentre/covid-and-excess-deaths-in-t...
I’m sorry you fell for Alex Berenson’s shtick but that doesn’t make you better informed.
The tweets are just shorthand for the links he's posting. Ignore them if you like but the evidence found there is real. The scientific establishment is wrong - how can it be otherwise with such mangled data?
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_US_dealership_disputes#T...
"The laws against direct sales arose historically in the United States starting in the 1930s, as automobile manufacturers started using independently franchised dealerships to offload the tasks of retail selling and servicing vehicles.[35] The laws have been actively defended into the 21st century and extended to online in-state sales.[36][37] Such regulations protect dealerships against a manufacturer opening its own dealerships and competing against resellers, which could be seen as an abuse of the manufacturer-franchise relationship.[35] Critics view the laws as thwarting legitimate competitive pressure that benefits consumers, and some have described them as "protectionism",[35] and "crony capitalism".[38]"