C is a good statically-typed language, but it's a bit basic.
ObjC is a good statically-typed language.
C++ is half a dozen good statically-typed languages, all fighting for supremacy like a ham actor's "multiple-personality-disorder" shtick.
ObjC is a good statically-typed language.
C++ is half a dozen good statically-typed languages, all fighting for supremacy like a ham actor's "multiple-personality-disorder" shtick.
"Statically typed objects have the same internal data structures as objects declared to be of type id. The type doesn't affect the object; it affects only the amount of information given to the compiler about the object and the amount of information available to those reading the source code."
How exactly is Obj-C "good"? Is it safer than C? Perhaps less verbose? Or maybe it's easier to use - libraries aside? Is it better because it runs on more platforms? Because it's standardized?
If all else fails, I think it must be the way that it manages to merge two completely different programming paradigms by just stapling them one onto the other.