I made millions out of the last debt crisis. Now the wealthy stand to win again
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
I just did an internet search, and it's called "crab mentality" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_mentality
> While any one crab could easily escape, its efforts will be undermined by others, ensuring the group's collective demise.
> It is not right that society’s richest people profit from this crisis while millions fall into desperate poverty. I include myself in this.
there is an easy way to start rectifying this injustice, if the author truly believes it is not fair. He can donate his wealth to the government - yes that is a thing. Will he do it? After all he argues it is fundamentally unfair. Writing an editorial is just talk, time he does the walk.
If he said that the would not mind paying more for taxes, that is ok.
Saying "it is not fair" is just populist BS - would you keep money that you honestly thought was given unfairly to you?
Think: a sincere declaration of a willingness to cooperatively sacrifice to solve a group problem, if others do too.
Don't think: an offer to individually self-immolate, which would not solve the problem. That is a straw man test of whether someone "means" business.
1) The "easy way" is not the same as the "correct and effective way".
2) He's young, retired, enormously wealthy, and can do anything he wants. But still donated his time/energy to help educate people about wealth inequality. To you, it may be "just talk" but he's already doing way more than 99.9% of people in his position.
Imagine you are in a position when something happens that you believe is unfair and you have a way to reduce that unfairness, even just a tiny bit. Wouldn't you do it?
Would you only write an editorial and not rectify it?
It would also lead by example. If others followed him, he would have helped the lives of many times that.