that seems odd; what is the performance impact of turning on Hyper-V for the root/host windows instance?
In my understanding on how a Hypervisor works, the only thing that I'm almost confident to say is that there is an impact but it's probably not noticeable or highly related to your workload (maybe on I/O?).
People will probably not care about that impact in fact (considering that Hyper-V is enabled by default and there are multiple security features of Windows now relying on Hyper-V).
I don't consider it odd. It is the way a Type 1 hypervisor works. Windows puts in some effort to hide most of that from the user.