‘Time has come’ for universal basic income, says Scotland’s first minister
independent.co.uk
independent.co.uk
When you take ownership of all the land and leave many landless, you owe them compensation. When you reserve the right to conscript people against their will to go to war, you commit yourself to their welfare.
Instead of UBI we should guarantee housing (ie. by building it) and also targeting a fixed population maximum, by restricting immigration, which will also reduce housing prices and increase wages.
Is it true that there are two populations - productive people and welfare dependents - and that people live their lives in one or the other bucket?
Is it true that the population that one belongs to is hereditary?
Is it true that people dependent on UBI would vote to increase it? Do people dependent on welfare vote to increase welfare in general?
Ah, I see it now.