The saying has to do with just having an idea is worthless in itself, you have to do something with that idea.
He interprets it as a shitty idea will be successful if executed well.
Wow.
The saying has to do with just having an idea is worthless in itself, you have to do something with that idea.
He interprets it as a shitty idea will be successful if executed well.
Wow.
Not that I endorse this. But I think it's a clearer way of saying it. The concern is that people are afraid to test their idea and get feedback to improve upon it because somebody may "steal" it.
> Bullshit.
> Ideas matter a lot, and if yours is a shitty one, for you, at that time, with the resources you have, it will almost certainly fail.
I think your interpretation of the author's interpretation is flawed.
The saying is more along the lines of "An idea without action is worthless"
His rephrasing of it was either a 1) bad interpretation or 2) a purposeful one so he could disagree with it and appear 'edgy'.