Not sure what to believe, but I have to admit the questions the guy is asking while showing satellite pictures and old photos are really intriguing. Never mind the possible farfetched explanation, at least you should wonder what possible explanation conventional history and science can provide.
|0] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5vXBfxN7rxKeJHJxS8dNDw/vid...
It was particularly funny when he got to the Parliament Palace in Bucharest, whose construction my parents remember well, and which you can find so many pictures of (not to mention pictures of how the location looked before everything on it was torn down to start work on this).
Basically, it looks like the author starts with the assumption that humanity can no longer build old-style buildings (as if it's hard to use columns) and builds their world-view from there. It is really quite funny.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4yaWXbBF7lYd/
It's very interesting how history becomes muddled over time.
It's really incredible what you can believe in with the right mix of bad education, lack of experience in the real world, and childlike thinking about how the world hasn't changed. Reminds me of when I was 5 years old and wondering how come some people are bor. children like me, while others were born as adults, or as old people!
As I said, I still doubt some of the explanations brought forward (e.g. the mining activities in the video I just mentioned) but when you see so much visible stuff from satellite imagery in the middle of nowhere in North America it really makes you wonder what was there, what do our history books say?
The reasons why they believe these things are also different - I haven't read Fomenko, but the videos above seem to focus on a belief that oldish-looking buildings can't be relatively new (they know this becaude they can't find examples of large oldish-looking buildings being built literally today in their area) , so they must have all been dug up from a much more advanced prior civilization, after they had been buried by the flood of Noah.