What features are you looking for?
What is your comfortable tech expertise to configure, organize, and maintain monitoring tools?
There are a few good OSS monitoring tools out there.
Alerta - Distributed, scaleable and flexible monitoring system.
Canopsis - Opensource Hypervision and Data Aggregation Software
Cacti - Web-based network monitoring and graphing tool.
Cabot - Monitoring and alerts, similar to PagerDuty.
Centreon - IT infrastructure and application monitoring for service performance.
check_mk - Collection of extensions for Nagios.
Flapjack - Monitoring notification routing & event processing system.
Icinga - Fork of Nagios.
LibreNMS - fork of Observium.
Monit - Small Open Source utility for managing and monitoring Unix systems.
Munin - Networked resource monitoring tool.
Naemon - Network monitoring tool based on the Nagios 4 core with performance enhancements and new features.
Nagios - Computer system, network and infrastructure monitoring software application.
Node-Bell - Real-time anomalies detection for periodic time series, metrics monitor.
Observium - SNMP monitoring for servers and networking devices. Runs on linux.
Opsview - Based on Nagios 4, Opsview Core is ideal for small IT and test environments.
Riemann - Flexible and fast events processor allowing complex events/metrics analysis.
Sensu - Open source monitoring framework.
Sentry - Application monitoring, event logging and aggregation.
Serverstats - A simple tool for creating graphs using rrdtool. (source on github)
Seyren - An alerting dashboard for Graphite.
Shinken - Another monitoring framework.
Xymon - Network monitoring inspired by Big Brother.
Zabbix - Enterprise-class software for monitoring of networks and applications.
Zenoss - Application, server, and network management platform based on Zope
Looks more like self promotion than a useful suggestion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitori...
If I worked there, it might be
But I don't
Thanks for making a false assumption, though
It's a poor suggestion either way.
Why?
Close to 2000 paying customers, and 20 years of history isn't good enough for you?
It's about adoption, skillsets available, industry standards. Never heard of this, the landing page does not instill confidence.
Hence poor choice
It really seems like you have an attachment to this project, at least na emotional one. How do you know how many paying customers there are?
Are you sure this was not a promotion of the project originally?
Keep spazzing on others' success if you want