The anti-ad argument is that he shouldn't have to buy this spirit. If Nike ads were replaced by a non-commercial alternative, then the boy could have that spirit without needing to spend the extra money on fancy shoes.
The anti-ad argument is that he shouldn't have to buy this spirit. If Nike ads were replaced by a non-commercial alternative, then the boy could have that spirit without needing to spend the extra money on fancy shoes.
Elvis Presley's guitar/clothes are worth more than the sum of their parts because he imbued it with that meaningful connection to whatever was higher than him.
Can you have a spirit without it being imbued in an object? The only other way of distributing connection to this stuff I can see is via people and you end up with a socially mediated distribution system.
If not, you're stuck with capitalism distributing spirits like it does everything else.
Wall to wall advertising to help everyone live a better life as cheaply & with as little environmental damage as possible.