WhatsApp ties NSO Group’s hacking operations to America in new court evidence
tech.newstatesman.com
tech.newstatesman.com
I'm surprised NSO Group employees and their families and affiliates aren't being treated as, at the very least, potentially-adversarial intelligence assets.
https://ifamericansknew.org/stat/cost_of_israel.html I've no idea of the reliability of that site, however the author was a former US Foreign Service officer.
Furthermore regarding the linked article, how is a loan guarantee just thrown in to the total. Unless Israel actually defaults on every single loan every year the cost of that is close to zero. Is that really a reasonable assumption to make? So now who's lying.
Israel is a home for many, many cyber security companies, on defense and offense.
> NSO's founders are ex-members of Unit 8200, the Israeli Intelligence Corps unit responsible for collecting signals intelligence.[9]
Not only that but these people are very tightly integrated into global tech giants - Apple's two large acquisitions in Israel (PrimeSense and Anobit), Facebook's Israeli R&D center (Onavo) and a significant part of Microsoft's cloud security division (Adallom) - all of those are ex. 8200.
Are you Israeli?
“NSO says “our clients do the hacking, not us”.
almost like
“Kim Dotcom says “our clients do share movies, not me”.
I mean, companies pay out bug bounties, this doesn't seem that much different
https://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/4zpkkm/release_p...
https://github.com/z448/pgcheck
https://info.lookout.com/rs/051-ESQ-475/images/lookout-pegas...
NSO Group isn't like Cozy Bear -- it's not a code name for an unknown probable nation-state APT. It's an Israeli company that sells hacking tools used by the Saudis (among others).
NSO Group was "tied to America" in a legal sense relevant to WhatsApp's lawsuit. There's no implication that it was, like, secretly the NSA or something. Just that this Israeli company rented US-based servers from a US-based company, and this invalidates some legal defenses they're using to fight WhatsApp's lawsuit.
If they didn't rent those servers, it would be very easy for them to say to the court "we did not rent those servers, our clients did". Notably, they did not say this. Probably because they did rent the servers, and if subpoenaed the hosting provider would produce receipts showing that. And then NSO's lawyers would get disbarred.