Ars reviews the Motorola Xoom
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I had a hard time figuring out how to get it to come on off of standby - there are no buttons on the sides besides volume, no button on the top (a plastic cover I thought might be a button, though) and unlike Android phones, no visible software buttons. It turns out there is a little round button on the back with a 'power' logo on it.
The home screen is neat looking. It shows an interesting mild 3-d cube effect when you flip between panes. I'm not sure if I like how the buttons (in the lower left) are only in software, and can change.
The browser seemed adequate to me. Pinching to zoom seemed a bit weird; one time I ended up in some other application and I'm not really sure what happened.
The Xoom also had Winamp installed (Winamp?) and the usual photo gallery, applications menu, etc. There is a special 'windows' menu that shows you open applications, which seemed convenient.
I think I would like a tablet a bit smaller than this, actually. I also checked out a Galaxy Tab, and it was pretty snazzy. Of course, there's always the iPad 2 coming out soon... while I like my Android phone, I love my iPod Touch. not sure what it is, something intangible.
I'm not surprised to hear that Ars thinks it seems a bit unfinished. My Motorola phone (a Droid 2) feels a bit unfinished, too. I had to return the first one I had for some problems with the camera, and the slightly newer one I have now is much more polished. Not sure why Motorola is in such a rush - it hurts their reputation.
> The back isn't entirely flat, which is odd compared to Apple products.
The iPad's back isn't flat either: http://www.gadgetvenue.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/apple-... -- at its thickest point it's about twice as thick as the edge.I feel that having to plug the tablet in every night would seriously limit m usage of it--especially on travels. One thing I love about my (Wifi-) iPad is that you can just pick it up instantly any time. If it would regularly run out of juice while not being used this would hinder that use case a lot.
[...]
Android in general is not especially robust, but the stability issues I encountered on the Xoom seem worse than the relatively minor stability problems I've had over the past few years with my various Android phones. I imagine that the stability problems will be ironed out as Google improves the platform.
And I would want to put up with this because ... ?
Waiting on promised fixes from Google, Motorola, or Verizon doesn't strike me as worth the money.
(And, no, I'm not arguing in favor of Apple's iOS devices. In fact, I feel poorly served by both Apple and Google - egregious policies on the one hand, and poor workmanship and customer service on the other.)
GODDAMMIT!!! Why?!?
Slow charging is better than no charging, being able to just use good old USB when the need arises is key for any mobile device. I just refuse to buy anything anymore that doesn't charge from micro or mini-usb.
I wish Canon would get on the bandwagon and allow recharging of their cameras in the same way.
It would be pretty easy to design a connector with two (mini|micro)usb male connectors on top of each other. Then you could trickle-charge to a single port from a normal USB connector and charge properly from the double-connector.
Plenty options. My favorite is TuneSync[1] which syncs your iTunes playlists over Cable or Wifi. There's also DoubleTwist (an iTunes clone) and about a dozen other options, some of which let you mount the phone as a filesystem, some specialize in syncing playlists with various apps.
The nice thing about TuneSync is that it can be configured to automatically attempt a sync whenever Wifi is enabled, or at regular intervals. That means in practice it will just sync whenever it comes near the computer. I sometimes quickly adjust my playlists in iTunes before leaving the house - and they sync while I'm already half out the door.
I'm longing for an intelligent way to sync. I have just now 200 GB of mp3s (and I'm not alone, nor exceptional, and I still have several hundreds CDs to convert), so syncing 1:1 simply can't work at all until we have terabytes in our portable devices.
I’m luckily still under 64GB (about 39GB, I sync 256kb/s AAC files because I can’t hear the difference) and it looks like my storage needs will grow slower than available SSD storage.
At least I think that’s the case. My music library grew by about 8GB in the last year but 2010 has been an exception. It’s usually around 3GB since about 2000 (I was twelve back then). If my music library continues to grow by 8GB I have until 2013 to get something larger than 64GB. That should be doable.
edit: reading the relevant part of the review, it is using MTP, which has built in support from Windows. Google is providing an app to add support on Mac OS X, on Linux it seems you need a recent version of libmtp and support from your music app. The link provided seems to be a way of making it appear like a mounted drive, as previous Android versions have done by default. Many small hardware music players have a firmware switch to change between USB and MTP mode so you can use either at your choice but I'm guessing that the extra SD card slot (which currently isn't working) will provide that capability for those that prefer it.