This is part of the reason systems like the patent system were created for inventions: to encourage people to bother exploring risky unknown spaces to develop inventions by granting them essentially a short term monopoly to harvest their reward which they would then compete against after a time period so society could further benefit from their finding by allowing competition to drive prices down and iterate on those inventions.
Obviously the patent system doesn't really serve this purpose anymore like so many systems that have been sidestepped/bypassed, changed through regulatory capture and corrupted by pure profit seeking behaviors.
Most brands at Walmart and other stores are sold many other places.
I would love to hear of consumer facing (B2C) online businesses who are successfully operating without any Google or Amazon dependencies to see if it's even possible in the current online ecosystem.
My hypothesis is that it isn't, and as such Amazon and Google should be broken up. They have close to a functional monopoly on consumers, but I'm putting forward that they also have a functional monopoly on online businesses in commerce.
Our sales are from word of mouth and direct marketing.
Without google search in anyway? There are some ig direct marketing businesses or ebay businesses.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/16/amazon-tells-house-it-doesnt...