Also, your statement that our economy has the capacity to provide a decent standard of living to everyone is an article of faith, not some falsifiable statement supported by facts. We don't know if that is true or not.
Also, your statement that our economy has the capacity to provide a decent standard of living to everyone is an article of faith, not some falsifiable statement supported by facts. We don't know if that is true or not.
They're related. There's both fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus going on here. The monetary stimulus only makes its way to consumers indirectly. On the fiscal side, as you say, Treasury can spend money on whatever they want. And when they do, they transform some of the financial sector's money into assets (treasuries). If the Fed wants to maintain its accommodative monetary policy, they're going to want to re-monetize those assets.
> your statement that our economy has the capacity to provide a decent standard of living to everyone is an article of faith
"decent standard of living" was not crucial to my point.
There's some part of our economy's productive capacity that we have consciously decided not to shut down because we've deemed "essential" to consumers. My point is that it would be a mistake for us not to provide consumers with the means (money) to access that capacity.