The Web-based version of Apple Music has officially launched
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Tidal and now Amazon offer lossless steaming, but I personally prefer the integration and UI of Apple Music with our various iDevices. I believe it also is still possible (though a little janky in the UI) to stream your own tracks back to yourself for when Apple Music is missing obscure recordings.
I keep saying it, but the perfect music service is obvious and nonexistent currently:
1. Good catalog of music
2. Lossless option (don’t believe it matters? Fine. Charge people who insist on it for the feature. I pay $25/month for a family Tidal subscription. You can think I’m a sucker.)
3. Let me add my own recordings with metadata and stream my unified catalog back to me in the same UI.
I understand they are trying to lock-in users to their platform / devices but there would be more users if cross-platform versions are available making more money for them eventually.
It's not like consumers are buying a Mac or iPhone because Apple Music experience is better, or iCloud experience is better.
Apple Music has been available on Android since basically day one and now it’s available on Amazon devices. AppleTV and AirPlay are being supported on third party hardware.
We had problems getting them to play Beatle songs and Frozen sound track! Repeatedly.
We switched back to Apple Music, and the voice commands worked fine.
So clearly Apple Music integration was far superior to Spotify at least with Amazon.
I read others had this problem, any idea what it was?