Yes. On one hand, I tire of numerous hot takes that start with "I'm not an epidemiologist, but..." which is followed by opinion un-anchored by practical experience and are coupled with a disregard for what has come before (community context). There are also a number of people in adjacent fields who are taking advantage of the situation to advance their careers.

On the other hand, I realize most experts carry the baggage of unrecognized assumptions in their toolkit, which need to be challenged (at the first principles level) by people outside the domain who don't carry the same baggage.

The ideal situation would be to leverage the expertise of both epidemiologists and non-epidemiologists on a common platform (that is not Twitter) and have them check and build on top each other's work.