What does this mean? It doesn't make sense in English, so could you please elaborate?
> someone should die without vaccine
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of why anti-vaxxers are a problem.
They don't just kill themselves. They break herd immunity and put other people at risk. They have already caused outbreaks that have killed adults and children who did get their vaccines.
herd immunity is a big deal for many different reasons
- it stops the spread
- it protects the immunocompromised
- it protects newborns and those too young/old to get vaccinations
If the ppl are vaccinated, those ppl should be safe, and in theory those unvaccinated masses dying off from X illness increases the overall fitness of the population.
However, it's not at all about that. This is about forcing those who may not think or believe the same to not only acquiesce, but to actively proclaim they are science deniers and that another group is infallible and correct.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer per-se, i think vaccines for things such as polio, mmr are important. But i don't think others such as flu and possibly hpv are worth the risk.
I don't support forced vaccination however, and the more those who loudly tout forced vaccinations the more it leads me to believe that there may be credibility issues with the vaccine efficacy and the vaccination's research.
We are not on the Lewis & Clark expedition, we live in a highly complex society, which requires serious maintenance.
How safe do you find those opioids now? What were they saying in front of the congressional committee? What were their sales reps saying? What were their privately-funded goal-seeking researchers saying?
Medical science and profit should not be mixed. I mean, look at this mess here in America.
It is called not throwing out the baby with the bath water.
Smart people make finer distinctions.
Please show me where I said, "All of medicine is therefore bad." No, you said that.
Now, will you apologize? I doubt it.
Will you do better at reading and understanding in the future? I sincerely hope so.
The sentence very clearly implies all, and nowhere in the post is an indication that you mean any restriction to part (vs all) of the med/pharm profession
In fact, you go out of your way to point out the malfeasance pushing opioids and imply that it also applies to vaccines, when it is entirely different industry segments, companies, etc.
I'll not only not apolgize, I'll point out that you are specifically arguing in bad faith, disingenuously arguing by implication, and when called out on it, histrionically backtracking and accusing others of falsehoods.
Grow up. learn science, stop trying to disingenuously undermine the good work of generations of researchers and physicians that keeps you healthy.
Sheesh