Reality of Group-Buying
sociallayer.tumblr.com
sociallayer.tumblr.com
These are people who love to find a deal, and if they went shopping and found an item with a great price on the tag, they still wouldn't feel excited about buying it unless it were ON SALE.
If this hypothesis is true, these people go from deal to deal on groupon every week. They surf the hottest local deals, but the only company loyalty they have is to Groupon themselves.
Who know's, maybe I'm wrong. But if I'm not, local spas and restaurants will eventually wise up.
And Living Social, and Crowd Cut, and DealPulp, and ValPak, and Eversave, and Mamapedia, etc. The people who you describe don't have any exclusive loyalty to Groupon; it's just another one of the dozen emails they get every morning with a possible deal.
The main advantage that Groupon has over these competitors is that "Groupon" has come to be genericized as a term for a group-buying deal. My wife never says, "Let's use that DealPulp I got last week." She says "I have a Groupon for 50% off, so let's go to Santorini for supper," even if it was a Living Social or Crowd Cut deal.
I've bought very few groupons (two total maybe) but I often browse the daily deals and have discovered quite a few interesting local businesses just by reading the groupon. That exposure alone seems like it has to be worth something to those businesses.
I'm not saying that this is effective--the only way to know for sure is through testing, which I'm sure Groupon can do, but I'm bothered by the author's manipulation of micro theory.
"It's hard to grow profits by selling to cheap people."
I do think there are situations where Groupon makes sense - primarily where you have a high fixed cost (like rent), high margins on the product (say, liquor) and poor utilization. The only time that's likely is with a new business, because it's not a stable state -- either you grow out of it, or you go out of business.
The problem is that Groupon, while attracting customers, also attracts customers who are more price sensitive, less loyal and have lower price expectations for the future. That's not as good as getting the customers the hard way: finding people who value your product enough to pay the normal price, and are happy with it.
The main value of using Groupon is that in exchange for offering a deep discount, you get the firehose turned on your business - it's a customer acquisition tool, using equal parts advertising and pricing. Businesses wouldn't get the same demand spurt by offering discounts without using Groupon.
What the author gets right is that it's an open question as to whether merchants can convert the discount buyers into regular customers.
However, short term advertising and pricing only moves you on the same demand curve. Unless you end up converting those discount buyers.
I think Groupon is a great way to get your business known, just don't put your eggs in one basket is all I am saying.
For example, a friend who lives in San Francisco bought a Segway tour of the city, which she would never on earth do had she not seen it on Groupon. She then asked 50 people to join her tour, and then plastered the photos all over Facebook. A lot of people now know these tours exist, and next time we have friends visiting from out of town, we'll be asking her about it. If the Segway tour operator had offered her a promo for referrals, all the more reason for us to remember the tours and book, preferably via her referral link.
I suspect the effect is similar to getting your startup covered in Techcrunch. Suddenly you get tons of pageviews and signups, but it's up to the startup to keep people coming back.
My answer? "If a two variable equation can explain things that PhD/MBA's with 20+ years experience don't get, yes."
Economics is very valuable but, imo, mostly on a higher level.
There are no data points, it is merely a tool to show what I was saying.