LOTS of people will, and we can reduce the risk with masks. Provide them to employees, require they wear them, maybe require customers wear them too.
LOTS of people will, and we can reduce the risk with masks. Provide them to employees, require they wear them, maybe require customers wear them too.
https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-workers-pandemic-risks-ow...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amazon-warehouse-workers-staten...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/04/11/corona...
It might help people be more comfortable performing essential tasks in public, but as long as we're seeing thousands of deaths per week on the news, people by and large are going to stay home if they can.
Are we doing everything we can to ramp up production as fast as possible?
Let's all just keep using rubber band party hat masks while the intelligent among us sport the P100 eliteness. /s
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/factsheet...
That's the free market.
Unfortunately, the CDC learned no such lesson and continued to operate as though no widespread contagious disease could possibly break out on US soil, as they had virtually no stockpile of masks nor even plans to secure the mask supply chain, etc (not to mention their testing strategy only scaled to hundreds of cases per day). I suppose that's the unitary state.
Of course, the CDC should have a serious reserve of masks (and other general equipment for the most likely outbreaks) and plans to secure the supply chain, including partnering with private industry to make sure they can operate at an increased capacity in case of emergency. There's no fundamental reason that our federal agencies have to be incompetent with respect to their fundamental purpose.
1. Masks were dirt cheap and certainly useful for any serious epidemic or bioterrorism event or just about any other emergency scenario for which the CDC would be called upon (our reserves were in the tens of thousands, but those masks sell for cents apiece—could have had a million masks for ~$500K)
2. The CDC didn’t even have plans to secure the supply chain, and plans are damn near free
3. The CDC was budget constrained but went and developed its own test instead of using the WHO test?
EDIT: Updated math figure
Something is seriously off with your math.
Thanks for the correction.
Remind me again how many flu deaths we had this season?
https://i.redd.it/u3fx3aw1n6s41.jpg
That's with a complete lockdown. What do you think that chart would look like if people were just 'left alone to get a bad cough'?
quite similar if it's as contagious as we're told.
Coronavirus: 1400-2000 deaths per day now, 23,000 total so far, still climbing.[2]
USA #1 in coronavirus deaths! [1]
[1] https://www.ft.com/coronavirus-latest
[2] https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/coronavirus-death...
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-2-New-I...