This is a good list for differences between FreeBSD and Linux distros, but describing them as advantages FreeBSD has over Linux seems problematic to me. Except for firewalls and core documentation (but what about "community documentation"?) nearly every item is highly debatable whether using FreeBSD has an advantage in the first place, and many I would argue Linux has obviously better options for [1].

To me, lists like this sadly highlights that FreeBSD has extremely few unique selling points left. I accept its superiority for network infrastructure type roles, but that's about it. As a Linux user, there's nothing on this list that makes me consider switching [2].

[1]: Anything to do with package management, containers and VMs and even filesystems Linux system can either do better out of the box or can easily be augmented if you need it. I also think systemd is better than shell script based inits. But there's a reason this is a footnote, this is not the thing I want to argue here.

[2]: Besides it taking effort to switch, FreeBSD has the additional problems that it has poor hardware support for desktop usage (PLEASE get your wifi act together), and software support is also substantially worse - with FreeBSD lagging behind with stuff like Electron, Wayland, desktop virtualization and desktop containerization (Flatpak, Snaps, Appimage even). The point here isn't these details, but FreeBSD winning over Linux people is an increasing uphill struggle.