I’m looking for your substantive comment on the article but I haven’t found it yet.

Pot, kettle, etc.

And I realize the irony in the fact that my pointing this out to you is the main subject of my not-substantive comment.

However, I won’t resort to accusing you of being simple minded, as I wouldn’t call someone who couldn’t make it though an article like this simple minded either.

The concepts and history presented are not terribly complicated, but the organization, length, and unnecessarily complex vocabulary make the article a difficult read.