I found an obscure political joke in the scan of a 1971 IBM logic block manual
twitter.com
twitter.com
Initial release 1961; 59 years ago
Latest release 19.0[1] / June 2019
I wonder who uses it today and for what?
They also have 'Concerns about the terminology' as the next section.
Personnel department perhaps? It's nice and bland.
(It's just a direct translation of the German Personalabteilung.)
A big part of HR is ass covering for the company. And I don't say that (purely) in a negative way: it is good and important for companies to have a structure for you to raise certain complaints independent of your line management.
Just keep in mind that HR's loyalty is to the company. Not to you nor in general your line manager.
.fill 69,4,0xfeadface | put out 69 0xfeadface’s
[1] http://personal.denison.edu/~bressoud/cs281-s07/Assembler.pd...There are some fun entries there for hex values used as magic numbers.
Apple have some great ones used in their crash report exception types - 0x2bad45ec (too bad for sec) and 0xc00010ff in the event of being killed for overheating.
[1] https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jbigham/pubs/pdfs/2019/twitter-alt-t...)
[2] https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/picture-descriptio...
Either way, anything that makes Twitter a little less awful is nice to see.
Mastodon started in 2016, so it was a bit early. It added this feature in 2017: https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/commit/4ec1771165ab8dd...
"I'll give you my Millard Fillmore PEZ Dispenser when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!" [3]
[1] https://louisianavoice.com/2015/07/02/taking-a-break-to-addr...
References to Watergate are ubiquitous (especially thanks to the angle journalists like to take on the current US president) and it was probably mentioned in history classes in school too at some point. I know it's supposed to be part of the curriculum in history classes in some German-speaking countries.
Granted it might not be familiar to someone from a non-western country though.
Anyone?
[1] http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/ibm/logic/SY22-2798-2...
The modern symbol has an arrow and doesn't have a closed rectangle
I came across the FET joke while looking up IBM transistor symbols in response to TubeTime's thread on the history of transistor symbols (which is an interesting thread you should read): https://twitter.com/TubeTimeUS/status/1249023089528078337
My "IBM is evil" bias leads me to guess they wanted to make their own standard that people started using. Then charge ridiculous license fees.
For anyone looking for an explanation of the newer symbol, this is a nice source: https://www.petervis.com/electronics/MOSFET_Symbol/MOSFET_Sy...
Arrows were used in 1975, see page 57: https://www.noao.edu/ets/Mechanical/Policies/ANSI%20Y32.2-19...
Will Rogers
Watergate wasn't a thing in 1971.
It really wasn't back in 'horse and buggy' days.
that's an interesting question. cars/motorcycles/fast things were a huge box-office theme in the 90s and 2000s, with many franchises featuring car thieves, enthusiasts, and racers -- but the same trend was around in the 70s.
If one generalizes social direction by using box office themes as an indicator, like plenty of people (probably unwisely) do, it's a tough question.
Sports car sales, a decent indicator of automotive interest due to their singular purpose nature, were higher in the 90s and 2000s than the 70s.
Just as a singular example, take the Corvette[0]. A practically useless car for anything but enthusiasts, sports driving, and status. It sold 21 thousand units in 71, and 53 thousand units in 84. If that's any indicator, the peak must've been past 71, at least, albeit that's a fairly weak indicator given the gas crisis a few years later that spurred most folks away from anything with a big engine.
Cars are still a huge status symbol for the rich, famous, and successful. Millenial-aged rappers are still buying Lamborghinis.
To be clear : I think you're dead-on correct that millenials are driving less, but personally I think that means more about millenials lack of financial mobility more than it does the failure of the automobile to allure current generations.
Cars are a status symbol because most city people don't really need them.
> About 87 percent of 19-year-olds in 1983 had their licenses, but more than 30 years later, that percentage had dropped to 69 percent.
> Drivers in their 20s, 30s and 40s also saw their ranks fall as a percentage of their age group population since 1983—down about 13 percentage points for those in their 20s, more than eight percentage points for thirtysomethings and nearly three percentage points for those in their 40s.
http://www.umtri.umich.edu/what-were-doing/news/more-america...
An aside but I’ve always found that turn of phrase bemusing. The right word is “can’t”, nobody says “I don’t swim” or “I don’t wire a plug”. It’s like people realise that it’s something they ought to be able to do and are deficient in it.
Undoubtedly more common in Europe - lots of Londoners don't own cars because there's nowhere cheap to park at either end of a trip, the traffic is bad, and the public transport is usable.
In my experience those people never use that phrase, they say “I don’t have a car”.