Hacker News Reader

Comment by corrigible | Hacker News Reader

Some of those dictators are even allowed to murder American journalists with no repercussions

You say journalist, I say imperialist spy. The line is blurred more and more these days, especially given the CFR's influence over American/Western media.

Please provide context on the imperial spy claim. I am guessing you and parent are referring to Khashoggi.

Try to look at this from the perspective of a country whose resources you are trying to protect from non-local usurpation by global Western organisations:

https://www.cfr.org/localjournalists

And no, I was referring to the spies posing as journalists in Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, and so on. This is most definitely a rabbit hole any enlightened western observer of world affairs should go down.

I don't understand anything of what you are implying nor does that link provide any information (at least to me).

The question is, putting people to death for crimes against the state, i.e. death penalties, etc.

A lot of "states" murder "spies". [ * ]

The proposition was that only a select few states murder journalists for such crimes. Journalism is the opposite of spy craft, so combining them for political purposes is deadly, indeed.

It should be stated up front that I, personally, don't think the state should have the right to murder anyone, and I also mean by means of war, asymmetric or otherwise.

( * -The moment someone murders in the name of the state, the state is over and its time for a new one.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com