US edits National Stockpile website after Kushner claims it’s not for states | Hacker News Reader

US edits National Stockpile website after Kushner claims it’s not for states

arstechnica.com

88 pointsrurp47 comments

Wow, what's most striking to me is the paragraph's writing has gone from simple and well written to something a middle-school student would produce:

", as well" -- unnecessary

"stop-gap buffer" -- redundant

"immediate supply...immediately available" -- redundant. If you really want to use "immediate" twice in a sentence for some unknown reason, use a synonym.

These three things are objectively bad writing, and this is coming from an engineer that isn't exactly Shakespeare.

The messy debris of a mind fighting itself.

Maybe Trump wrote it himself.

The Elements of Style would implode.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Style

Though not the best book on writing in English, not by a long shot, it is a fantastic intro/solution to the question of 'How do I write better?'.

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

we have always been at war with Eastasia

Just replace Eastasia with Centralasia and it feels about right by now.

“ The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right.“

- George Orwell, 1984

There are four lights.

Worse, in medical equipment purchases, the Federal Government is spitefully outbidding Governors whose names are followed by a little letter they don't like.

https://wfpl.org/federal-government-outbids-kentucky-for-med...

The residents of Kentucky, as a voting bloc, have voted for the republican presidential candidate for at least a generation (and probably longer than that). I understand the governor is a democrat, but it seems like a more simple explanation exists rather than Trump's administration intentionally harming a solidly-red electorate out of spite for their governor.

A more simple explanation may be that Trump's administration, and therefore the federal government, has been flat-footed almost every step of the way (if you need a source on that, check the "front page" of every major, left or right-leaning news service in the US) and is now doing everything in their power to address their shortcomings which includes getting their hands on as much PPE, medical devices, etc. as possible.

It does further speak to their inability to rise to the moment by not better-coordinating their purchases with the needs of the states. The administration deserves massive blame here for their initial and likely ongoing response to this and should be held accountable, but let's hold them accountable where the facts are nearly-indisputable (there are plenty of those facts to go around).

I’d be really interested in who the stockpile is meant for if it’s not for people living in states.

I imagine they might say it is for helping other nations. The reality is it probably really is for the states. The conspiracy theory is probably that it is for the 1% and for those in power.

> I imagine they might say it is for helping other nations.

Given that the administration is halting exports of masks to Canada and Latin America from 3M, I somehow doubt that the reserves are for helping other nations.

But haven't the reserves been built up over many decades? The reasoning behind the reserve probably long predates the current administration.

There's some truth to the idea that the Feds do need some reserved for things like embassies, warships, FEMA, etc.

The current meme going around local news Facebook comments seems to be that the Feds are just a backup with no direct responsibilities for disaster management, though, and that it's all on the states for being unprepared. Which, well, is bullshit.

Is it? I'm honestly asking. As an American, I understand there's a division of responsibility between the federal state governments for disaster preparedness, but I don't know exactly what that agreement entails (or even if it's clearly written down somewhere). Without a clear understanding of who's responsible for what, it seems easy to point fingers depending on political preference.

If anyone has more knowledge and is willing to share, I'd appreciate it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Emergency_Management_A...

"The agency's primary purpose is to coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities."

Yes, I agree that the feds should step in at this point (and should have done so long ago). What I'm curious about is the responsibility each state has to, for example, maintain their own stockpile of PPE. What are the resources that have been overwhelmed (and does it vary by state)?

States absolutely have stockpiles, but more for the "there was an earthquake/hurricane/bombing" sort of scenarios where there'd be mutual aid from other states after a few days/weeks and you could readily rebuild the stockpiles in a few weeks by placing some orders with 3M etc.

I don't think any state is going to wind up having had a stockpile sufficient for this sort of prolonged, world-affecting disaster.

The fed govt can print and borrow money at will, which states cannot and which is crucial in large scale disasters like this.

The federal government can comandeer private businesses to produce whatever it wants.

I don’t think states can do this

I don't think the states would _want_ to do this. Gov control of business closer to the local level means you're closer to your constituents.

They are for the states but my favorite theory is a large number don't work[1] and the administration is attempting to save face until they can swindle replacements internationally.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/01/us/politics/coronavirus-v...

The entire press conference was stating that the federal stockpile is not a grocery store, but is to be mobile based upon where the federal government feels it is needed, and no state has the right to demand and send a shopping list.

I don't know how you look at a metropolitan area like NYC overrun with cases, and decide there isn't a need there. Are they waiting until it hits Montana?

Not a state that can sway Republican, unlike Florida. [0]

[0] https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/4/3/21206170/us-emergency-st...

That's of course a completely sensible stance, but what's the current standing protocol, or it's just what Trump feels at the moment?

So many people blame Trump, when in reality there are 10's of thousands of goverment workers that work tirelessly every day and go unnoticed (good and bad). In regard's to my initial comment, here is a great example of Washington state receiving ventilators from the stock pile, and then sending them back for use elsewhere:

https://nypost.com/2020/04/06/washington-returns-hundreds-of...

FEMA, CDC, or National Guard? I honestly don't have an answer to that, but I would highly doubt Trump is putting them in a golf cart and driving them around...LOL

More like some states only, like Florida. The Governor of Florida, if I might point out, had been declining calling for a lockdown/quarantine well into need, but Florida still has a much less sever case than NY, which has been asking for aid for weeks along with other states.

[0] https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/4/3/21206170/us-emergency-st...

It's pointless partisan "gotcha" posturing from the press and nothing more. Anyone with half a brain understood Kushner perfectly well: this is the emergency stockpile to prevent hoarding "for the future" by states. Resources are delivered to individual states at a short notice after they tally up how much of the already allocated resources they are already using, to make sure e.g. thousands of ventilators don't sit in some NJ warehouse for days while at the same time CNN is telling everyone there aren't enough of them.

CNN isn't telling people there aren't enough of them. The governor of New York is telling people there aren't enough of them.

It's a lie by omission. The governor of New York has acknowledged several times that they have enough now, but anticipate running out at some point in the future. The gap between what he anticipated from the models last week and the hospitalizations on the ground is ~3x right now. Which is something CNN won't explicitly tell you, but you can easily see it from multiple public sources.

I wonder how long it will take for this thread to be buried by people as eager to cover for the regime's ineptitude as Kushner is.

57 minutes, apparently.

Can someone explain why this is HN-worthy? I don't get it.

- startup-related: no

- involves hacking: no

- of general technical interest: no

HN is (usually) a refuge from the otherwise saturated world of political mud slinging.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

"Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com