A secretive group trying to bring down North Korea’s regime
msn.com
msn.com
The "kid" in the phrase "kid gloves" doesn't refer to children. It refers instead to leather made from kid goats. Kidskin leather is thinner and softer than other kinds of leather, and doesn't leave smudges on delicate articles. Hence the phrase "kid glove treatment", implying handling something with delicacy and tact.
One fairly high-profile (yet topical) example of this is the top flight of German Football. East German teams rarely even make the German Bundesliga[0], and my understanding is that there’s currently only one Eastern German team in the 20-team league.
0: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/oct/17/west-g...
Building up North Korea isn't hard, living in North Korea is hard.
The reason it's important to me to say so is that at some point, some actual people with actual (limited) resources, will have to devise a plan to make it all better, and then actually do the plan. That is a huge challenge that involves trade offs and hard decisions. And if you start with magical thinking, instead of extremely realistic reasoning, you're going to end up hurting a lot of people.
For political reasons, reunification would be inevitable. It has been the stated goal of politicians for decades.
For economical reasons, reunification would be devastating. South Korea is not exactly poor, but the amount it would take to lift North Korea to a living standard which is not outrageously low (let alone comparable to the South) would be immense, and the living standards of South would plummet very significantly. This is a totally different kind of deal than reunification of Germany.
For cultural reasons, reunification would be a tough cookie. Nearly 70 years apart, in strict isolation, and under a constant inescapable brainwashing made North Korean culture drastically different from Southern Korean. Even the language evolved differently (and totalitarian regimes are keen to control and bend the everyday language to match their narrative). Now North and South are not separated brothers but more like distant cousins who grew separated by an ocean.
So South Korea will try to keep North Korea going as much as possible without losing face.
Source: a few lectures by experts in the question.
Tell China they can control the territory in exchage for them stopping all hostilities in the South China Sea (where they falsely try to claim international waters by building artificial islands.)
That + making NK a nuclear free zone could be a compromise that benefits everyone
What does China gain here? Integrating North Korea would be no simple task, and there would be no real military benefit over the current situation. Meanwhile they'd give up their (legitimately weak) claim over parts of the South China Sea oil reserves and trade routes.
>That + making NK a nuclear free zone could be a compromise that benefits everyone
North Korea has been offering that compromise for decades, the US refuses to make all of Korea a nuclear bomb free zone.
They don't need to run it directly. Just replace Kim with some council of generals that's a little less extreme.
They'd gain the buffer they want between them and SK, international recognition - the South China thing is one of the few instances of them projecting force outside their borders.
If they couple a less aggressive stance on the South China Seas with their usual belt and road spending, they'd be playing the optimal strategy. After all, that's how the USA beat the USSR: outspend them until they collapse in on themselves.
>North Korea has been offering that compromise for decades
North Korea is in no position to offer anything. They would be wiped off the earth if they used their nukes.
They would be wiped off the earth if the US used their nukes at any point for the past sixty years. That's why they desired nukes. If you fear North Korea using them then stop threatening then.
You can't threaten "then" with self defense. I live in a stand your ground state. If someone starts getting violent, and I remind them of the potential consequences of their actions, I cannot be charged with a crime.
Thought to be clear, I don't think NK should be pre-emptively nuked. And I don't think they should be invaded.
But they can't have it both ways. They regularly get away with things that would be acts of war if done by a larger nation (like shelling SK territory).
It's only been sixty years since the US literally razed the entire country to the ground. It doesn't need to happen again for them to be worried that it might, particularly as we have had nukes pointed at their face for the entire time. This is clearly a threat, not "self defense."
>But they can't have it both ways. They regularly get away with things that would be acts of war if done by a larger nation (like shelling SK territory).
Ignoring the fact that they are already at war with South Korea and the US, the US has continued economic warfare on the country killing uncountable amounts of people over that time. Many North Korean actions are inexcusable, but they are not the sole bad actors in this conflict.
Is there such a thing as reckless treason?
Also, this would be a wonderful movie!
Hearts are in the right place, but I advise them to leave the ops to the professionals.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200403225044/https://www.wsj.c...
Edit:
From the FAQ for HN:
>Are paywalls ok?
It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.
In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so.
Or find it cross-published in some news aggregator:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/inside-the-secretive-gr...
Edit: Also, thank you for the working link.
EDIT:
Actually that doesn't even seem to be working now.
What does work is adding ?fbclid=xxxx to the end of the URL.
This site works sometimes.
I have javascript disabled and see no paywall.
Edit: All other discussion occurred after this point. It's possible the paywall prevented discussion.