CO2meter: A Python interface to USB CO2 monitor devices
github.com
github.com
You're probably going 'Wow that's expensive for a CO2 meter when I can goto Aliexpress and get one for $10!' This is actually pretty cheap for a NDIR sensor which is what one should use for CO2 monitoring. The cheapo $10 sensors are all VOC sensors that require calibration and can be affected by airborne pollutants like alcohol.
I believe this is only 100ppm accuracy, the 5-10ppm resolution sensors are many hundreds of dollars. It's fine enough for casual air quality measurements.
The S8-0053 looks interesting, but I have no experience with it. Also NDIR, boasts +- 40ppm accuraxy -- the room air might not even be that homogeneous...
The cheap ones are electrochemical, and they're not even that cheap.
So the price of a good, fully realized NDIR CO2 meter is comparable with any low-volume, moderate precision, moderate complexity electronic device.
So i thought maybe i give this sensor a shot but i can't find a reputable source for it. Does someone knows where to buy it or uses another module that works good?
CO2meter.com is a good source for buying OEM CO2 sensors, although a little too coy with manufacturer's data sheets, in my opinion.
Virtually all NDIR CO2 sensors use some sort of automatic calibration, where the lowest reading in a certain period of time is assigned the value 450ppm. If that's accurate for your area and you can guarantee that the space the sensor is monitoring is unoccupied during that period of time, its not bad. Otherwise, a reference gas is the only way to really trust the readings.
The next time we move house, proper ventilation is definitely one of the first things we'll check.
Automatic calibration can be disabled.
I've tested a lot of different sensors and the SCD30 is more expensive than the Chinese sensors but in my experience it's much more accurate. The problem with all of these sensors is calibration. They naturally drift over time so you need some way to compensate for that. There are a few common approaches:
- Assume that every single day, the sensor is completely immersed in fresh air at some point - this is the way the MH-Z19 series of sensors works. It can make sense in business HVAC systems where it's common to do a fresh air purge every 24h but in a residential environment it's unreliable because there's no guarantee that a room will return to fresh air levels of CO2 (e.g. if a room only has 3-4h unoccupied and the windows aren't open, it might not return to 400ppm). To be clear, this isn't a problem unique to the Chinese sensors. There are also expensive sensors from major and reputable manufacturers that act this way, again, because it's common in commercial HVAC systems to do a daily fresh-air purge.
- The above but a bit more intelligent - this is the SCD30's method: it looks at the previous 7 days of data and only if there were at least 5 days where the baselines are within 50ppm of each other, treats the average of those baselines as the fresh air concentration. This makes it fantastic for residential applications. Even if your room's CO2 levels don't return to 400ppm every day, as long as they don't consistently return to another baseline, the auto-calibration cycle won't run and mess up your data.
- Manually do a baseline calibration every few months: make the user take the sensor outside into fresh air (or vent a building with fresh air) and tell the sensor "the CO2 concentration right now is 400ppm" - this is the only way the MH-Z19 and similar sensors can really be made anything close to accurate.
Also, make sure to avoid anything other than NDIR sensors. There are a lot of "eCO2" sensors that give you estimated CO2 levels based on VOCs, which always results in garbage readings.
Finally, you can usually buy the SCD30 very easily. It's routinely stocked by electronic component distributors so you can just look it up in OctoPart[1]. Make sure to avoid the eval kits though.
[0]: https://www.sensirion.com/en/environmental-sensors/carbon-di...
[1]: https://octopart.com/search?q=Sensirion+SCD30¤cy=USD&s...
Is that documented anywhere? I couldn't figure out why mine is reading garbage, it could be that it didn't see fresh air every day for a full week
Not seeing fresh air for a week isn't enough to throw it off, it needs to not have seen fresh air for a week _and_ the baselines that it has seen have to be within 50ppm of each other.
Have you allowed it to calibrate even once? It needs 7d of uninterrupted power and daily fresh air for the initial calibration.
You can also do forced calibration against a known value using the process on page 14 of [0].
It can also give iffy results if the temperature/humidity values are totally out of whack, which could happen if it's put in an enclosure or something like that. You can set an offset using the instructions on page 15 of [0].
There's also altitude compensation but unless you're doing something really weird that shouldn't affect you so much.
Finally, there's sensor placement [1]. It shouldn't be placed in such a way that there's a lot of air flowing over it directly (e.g. exposed to the air). If it's in front of a fan or something it's going to do weird things.
I'd suggest placing it outside for a few minutes and see what the readings are. If they're far from 400ppm it definitely needs calibrating.
[0]: https://www.sensirion.com/fileadmin/user_upload/customers/se...
[1]: https://www.sensirion.com/fileadmin/user_upload/customers/se...
Disagree. I've moved co2 sensors between sea level and 2000m, and measured reference 400ppm gas and seen quite large differences (~150ppm). So it can matter. That's the reason why the SCD30 allows you to set an altitude or pressure.
But its not important enough to constantly feed it pressure data, a once-a-day pressure reading from the NWS would be sufficient.
Where does one buy a reliable indoor sensor ?
I feel like PM sensors are easy to understand. I wish i had a better grasp on VOC/TVOC though.
It's hard to interpret what an elevated VOC from my foobot actually means.
Sensing VOC's accurately is really difficult because most sensors have radically different (orders of magnitude) sensitivities to multiple compounds but can't actually distinguish between them. The readings typically get heavily skewed by the presence of minute amounts of some compound the sensor is very sensitive to. I tried several sensors and the best I could get out of them was a relative "good / bad" reading.
https://www.amazon.com/CO2Meter-RAD-0301-Mini-Monitor-White/...
[1] https://www.tfa-dostmann.de/en/produkt/co2-monitor-airco2ntr...
It's super cool how open source projects make it easy to get a great UI, built-in basic statistics etc, with a few hours of datasheet reading.
Word of warning though: make a proper enclosure for the sensor. Mine is now perpetually reading 1400 ppm or above after a fairly rough move, even outside (where it should be about 415 ppm).
Plugged it in and the alarm started going off immediately at 3000ppm. I use this package to graph out the readings.
Recently started at a new job and had to educate everyone on the issues with CO2 build up in meeting rooms. We got each meeting room outfitted with a sensor and custom monitoring with grafana now.
(really could be just me though)