100% echo this statement. I have dozens of customers who went to VDI in Azure as their immediate work from home solution. I can't think of a single one that went to AWS. The article makes a bunch of baseless claims to get to an unproven conclusion.
>It’s safe to say that AWS runs a much bigger, if not more critical, chunk of the digital world than Azure.
Based on?? If o365 goes down for any extended period of time, most of the fortune 100 can't do business.
> it generally lacks operational experience in running “always on” services and preparing for unanticipated traffic surges.
Ya... Microsoft lacks experience running always-on services... they'd only been managing hotmail for a decade before AWS was even in beta. They have no experience running always-on services AT ALL.