Hacker News Reader

Comment by smacktoward | Hacker News Reader

So crawl the Wiki pages, grind out static HTML copies of them, and make those available. Not many security risks associated with static HTML.

What am I missing here?

View on HN

I did this for a forum I used to host for many years. I crawled versions for people (using a user with the same rights as they did so it wouldn't contain anything extra) with static assets and referred images and zipped that up, so they could browse the old posts locally and nostalgize. It worked really well.

Maybe the people at UE need to be taught how to use wget.

The only other "security risk" I can imagine such a read-only wiki could present is if it documents something that could be considered "risky" from a security perspective. That would make this more of a censorship situation.

> We still have the data, and as mentioned above, we will work to migrate the top content into various official resources. In the meantime, we’re investigating how we can make this content available, even in a rudimentary way.

This indicates otherwise.

I read it's very easy to that nowadays with Chrome's Puppeteer.

Easier still with wget perhaps? https://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/wget.html#Very-Adva...

Static content needs a web server and a way to move the content to the server (ftp, sftp, rsync..), and ssl certification, and a DNS entry, and DDOS protection, and a way to manage credentials for those things. It's not zero risk at all. There are plenty of ways to attack a static site. The only way static is safer is because you're not executing scripts on the server (which is a massive win, I don't want to down play that aspect), everything else is the same as a dynamic site.

That's still a lame excuse though. They could have outsourced all the "hard" stuff to a free Netlify account.

Like what problem specifically that you cannot mitigate? If you can't just host static contents on a new empty server and get it going, how does the rest of the world work at all?

That is just an excuse.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com