Faceparty tells critics to F*** Off, suspends entire site
uk.techcrunch.com
uk.techcrunch.com
My (old) firm used to represent the founder behind faceparty (Lance). He really is like that in person and would certainly shut the site to spite the users.
Good to see it has had a positive effect though!
But no, they're pretty much dead on here.
Running a social network is like running a bar (or pub in this case). If the owners get fed up and are willing to live with the consequences, why not lock the doors and go to the zoo for the day?
Some users can get pretty abusive after a while.
I'm not sure why they didn't just direct the troublemakers to this page, and let others access the site though.
Anyone remember Cartmanland?
http://www.google.com/trends?q=faceparty.com
It might reverse the trend (pun intended).
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=puns
;)
You are telling maddox, not me, right?
I know, I didn't think that was possible either.
Anyone know of other successful cases?
All the publicity I have seen so far has been favourable i.e. not bad and will encourage people to join rather than leave.
Was wondering about other precedents?
Tags: [Faceparty] [Twitter] [uptime] [reliability] [denied]
"Our" goal? You.. claim to represent the hacker news community? And - I presume only - downvote me for my opinion?
I don't want it to be Christian. Just refined :) Just because it's a social setting on the internet doesn't mean it has to be trashy.
If someone goes through my comments and finds I've broken my own standard here somewhere in my history on the site then I admit my hypocracy in advance. I think I've been good though - hacker news tends to be civilised and there's a feedback loop in that.
Shutting down your social site with a profanity ridden rant on the front page isn't something I've read of anyone doing before, and it will be interesting to see the result (if anyone ever follows up).