Ask HN: What do you think of my site's redesign and landing page?
http://www.disrupt.fm
http://www.disrupt.fm
Headline: check Screenshots: check Social Proof: check Call to Action for musicians: check
(EyeQuant is my neurotechnology startup - we deliver over 90% of eye-tracking study's accuracy within seconds via a web service at http://eyequant.com)
However, I think you want to work on your message(s). First of all, you have two audiences (as reflected by your two call to action buttons):
1. musicians who'd like their music to go viral 2. listeners who'd like to discover new music
It would make sense to either have two distinct blocks on your landing page, where each comes with a single value proposition that is tailored towards each target segment:
1. "Let your tracks go viral via Facebook!" <-- more often than not, headlines like these convert much better than generic product descriptions (as in your current message...) 2. "Discover and download free music now!" <-- note how the second call to action in your current design is barely visible. A good workaround would be to introduce a second color that reflects the "other" value proposition in general, too.
Thanks again
2. I'm not entirely sure what your site is, judging from the homepage. I know you explain it on the tour page, but it should be immediately obvious what your site does. Cool idea, but you should communicate it more clearly.
2. I would switch the text styling for the quote and the "Viral music distribution via Facebook"... first, we want to know what it does, then smaller, we want to know who's talking about you.
3. I would restructure the middle call-out box - something about the overlap is throwing me off. I would keep it two hard columns. Or, maybe, have the "Viral music distribution" in the highlighted text be above, centered, and then two shorter columns below with the "Learn More" and the quote on the left, and the images on the right.
It looks like that's two votes now to make the "Viral distribution via Facebook" text larger. I think you're right that it'll probably be better to have that text first with the quote second.
Very helpful, thanks!