[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futures_contract
[1] https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/crude-oil/light-swee...
If the price were to rise in the future, the value of the contract would be much higher than what you bought it at, and someone interested in further trading in the options contract or even buying the actual underlying world more pay the market value of that options contract to you.
I just checked: the current price of a single options contract of crude for 18 Sept at buying price (CALL) of USD 10, is 0.3. So buying a 100 (the minimum), would cost about USD 30. Now, ID between now and September the price of crude were to shoot up, then the market price of this option would likely rise.
Unlike stock, though, Options expire. But unlike stock, you get to buy the rights to buy or sell at a particular price and thus the capital needed is far lesser.
If you can store the oil you can earn a lot of money now. But most people can't store much oil, compared to the volumes that are being pumped out of the ground. And for many of the producers, slowing down production by more than a few per cent is also difficult — once you turn off the tap you don't really know whether the oil is going to start flowing again later. So the effect is a steep price fall.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-03/that-time...
Wait, really? I'm Googling but can't seem to find anything at all about shutting down oil wells temporarily.
What exactly is the difficulty? Why would "turning off the tap" be a risk -- the pressure oil might be under isn't going to go away, is it? (If it doesn't require pumping.) Is it a risk that materials in the drilled hole harden if not moving? I would have thought the difficulty might be how to effectively cap a well that is under pressure -- is it so difficult that closing a well risks damaging the equipment that it can't be safely opened back up?
Really curious here if you have the answers! The fact that oil wells can't be slowed down is definitely one of the most surprising economic facts I've learned in a long time.
To begin with, the oil is there, stably, at rest. At some point people come along, estimate the layout of the rocks (many km³ and far underground) and drill holes to change the way the pressure works and make as much as possible of the oil flow to a particular location. The geology decides how much that is, modified by the paths of the holes involved, and also by how much water is pumped in, where.
If you now close it quickly, the pressure's going to change somehow and you don't know precisely where and how. The end effect may be that when you reopen, something has changed down there such that instead of extracting 40% of the total oil you can only get 39%. Or such that you have to drill more holes in order to gain back your production velocity, the cost of which is far higher than producing at a loss for a month.
You mean it can actually physically stop if the flow from the ground is blocked for a while? Can you expand if possible.
Edit: I understand it comes out of the ground quite hot (I've heard of 200 C) and if it flows into cool pipes and stays still maybe it would 'congeal'.
Another way of looking at it is: You've drilled holes to make the oil flow. There are kilometers of rock on top of the oil layer, pushing down, pushing the oil towards the holes you've drilled. You can close the end of the hole, but you can't make that weight go away. The system is going to find a new equilibrium. The new equilibrium is not one you've tried to optimise for maximum total oil production.
One of the only scenarios that might lead to wells failing to flow when reopened would in wells that were freshly tracked without flowing back the frack water. In this case the frack water will soak into and damage the clay-like minerals in the rock and damage the permeability of the rock.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-03/that-time...
Am I misunderstanding?
Selling the futures is the profitable end of the trade. Spot prices for WTI are about $20. That same oil can be sold in May 2021 for 35.53. Part of that difference is cost of carry (storing and insurance), but there is still a profit to be made.
You never have to exercise if you don't want to so there's a fixed maximum cost
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume there is a good reason why banks require additional paperwork from people who want to trade options/futures that must be renewed on a regular base.
Both call and put options are optional for the option holder to exercise (realistically you only ever exercise if they are in the money, or worth something). You usually don't need any additional paperwork to buy options
Writing options on the other hand has unlimited potential downside. It's much harder to get brokers to allow you to do this. Many will only let you write "covered" options - meaning you also hold the underlying shares, which limits your downside
https://adventuresincapitalism.com/2020/03/19/crude-contango...
> USO holds near-month NYMEX futures contracts on WTI crude oil.
Without looking any deeper I don't think this is what OP is looking for. They want to bet that oil delivered a year from now is under-priced today, while buying this ETF is betting that oil delivered a month from now is under-priced today (and holding this ETF is repeatedly renewing that bet). It's a completely different thing.
gasoline degrades with a shelf life measured in weeks-months-years, depending on grade and preservative measures
Depending on the curve of the pandemic, 2021 may be too early. The way the US govt is responding, it may drag out much longer