FDA Approves Clinical Trials to Use Antibodies from Recovered Patients
good-news.network
good-news.network
http://good-news.network/article/3XqVFb 302 Redirect http://pubx.co/3XqVFb
301 Redirect https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/new-york-to-deploy-covid-pla...
Ahh, spammy blog with shady ad-block circumvention.
With the high R0 and the fact so many people end up with no symptoms, negligible symptoms or mild flu-like symptoms, it can't really be stopped.
I'd volunteer. Not that I think we should, though.
If this would be an effective solution people would volunteer for sure.
The UK had 750,000 people signing up to volunteer for the NHS which could expose them to getting infected in the midst of the epidemic without guarantee of even getting admitted to a hospital if the situation would continue to escalate.
If you think you won’t get 1000’s of volunteers for a relatively low risk infection that would put you under 24/7 VIP medical observation and would likely get you first access to any medical assistance required if things would turn to the worse you clearly don’t understand people well enough.
And this is without the potential financial and societal benefits those people would directly and indirectly receive.
People are doing a lot more dangerous things for a lot less of a pay out in a daily basis.
Some small percentage of young people are dying from the flu too, it's unfortunate, and it happens. We need to keep our eyes focused on the statistics not the anecdotes.
Every disease is potentially fatal. We definitely shouldn't intentionally infect anyone. It's just not necessary.
yep. Even 100K people at $100K would be just $10B, a laughable amount compare to the $6T stimulus in US.
Either way, people can always infect themselves under most ethics.
Edit: Society at large bears the cost when healthcare is nationalized. If you get your insurance through your employer, those thousands are paid by your employer and co-workers.
I only considered the harm to yourself, but the risk you put others in is also a real factor.
The best I have is the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) which did a study on all 2003 dead (back when that was the number). Only 5 have been under the age of 40 and all of them had medical preconditions.
There are young and healthy people that show heavy symptoms and even need ventilation, but they all seem to survive.
[1] https://www.pulmonologyadvisor.com/home/topics/pneumonia/bac...
yet, it is somehow ethical to send young healthy people to kill and die in the meaningless wars driven by corporation profits. I think your ethics has extremely serious ethical flaws.
Without having to deliberately put people directly in mortal danger.