Banning travel between large areas is ridiculous and wouldn't happen. Especially when a policy of quarantine during outbreaks would be equally effective with a vastly smaller cost.
Banning travel between large areas is ridiculous and wouldn't happen. Especially when a policy of quarantine during outbreaks would be equally effective with a vastly smaller cost.
PS: China’s case fatality rate broke 4%, though they likely undercounted cases by ~50% if not more.
I might have been unclear, but I was suggesting quarantine for everyone coming in, as an alternative to banning travel forever.
Quarantine set up once you already have an outbreak is uh, a different matter.
Saying they waited to long is true, but simply means it fails due to politics.
Edit: NM, misunderstood what you where referring to.
A total travel ban would also fail due to politics, so that's not a really helpful criteria.
Also, there's a lot more to environmental destruction than excess carbon.