That said, I noticed the strange behavior around this article as well. I've seen it pop up multiple times in various content aggregators, and the /r/technology mods even removed the post that I happened to notice and comment in.
I'm not sure why, it seemed like a completely reasonable article on its face. But maybe there's something underhanded going on behind the scenes?
Regarding the second point: And I think we agree here, the article is odd. It definitely seems like there's an anti-Edge narrative trying to achieve mindshare.
I should have decoupled my original comment, and only discussed the circulation of the article, as that's more concerning.
I think chrome is a good browser as long as your careful about which settings you toggle and you can live with the vendor having a mild incentive for adding new settings with bad (from a privacy pov) defaults. In return, you arguably get the most secure browser.