https://covidtracking.com/data/
We have tested 150K people.
We have 327M people in the US, we have tested 0.00046% of the population.
We do not have tests.
https://covidtracking.com/data/
We have tested 150K people.
We have 327M people in the US, we have tested 0.00046% of the population.
We do not have tests.
It's great that tests are finally ramping up but the growth in testing can never exceed the growth in cases if cases are doubling every finite number of days. The choices are a severe lockdown where R < 0.5 until the true case count drops to near 0, a non-severe lockdown where R ~1.2 - 1.8 (Hubei's lockdown had an R of 1.3 in the early days until they figured out centralized quarantine could bring it down to 0.4) and you just continue the lockdown indefinitely, or "herd immunity" where R stays at 2.4 until pretty much everyone in the country gets sick.
Once you get your true case load down below your test load, then you can think about using non-pharmaceutical interventions (universal masking, universal temperature screening, mandatory hand washing when entering into a gathering space etc.) along with rigorous contact tracing to ensure that any future outbreaks remain small and contained.
You don't need to test people every day for 14 days.
You didn’t multiply by 100 to change from per unit to per cent.
Still bad though.
https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/20-20-bioresponse-...