Design for Living: What’s Great about Goethe?
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
While it's an awesome book and a really good introduction to Germany, I can only "mildly" recommend it because it's 800 pages of short biographies. It took me 6 months to finish. It's a bit of a slog.
It feels especially poignant these days, even haunting.
(If you want to hear it in German, Schubert turned into a “Lied” [2]).
Wandrers Nachtlied ("Wanderer's Nightsong")
Über allen Gipfeln
Ist Ruh,
In allen Wipfeln
Spürest du
Kaum einen Hauch;
Die Vögelein schweigen im Walde.
Warte nur, balde
Ruhest du auch.
O’er all the hilltops
Is quiet now,
In all the treetops
Hearest thou
Hardly a breath;
The birds are asleep in the trees:
Wait, soon like these
Thou too shalt rest.
(Henry Wadsworth Longfellow)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanderer%27s_Nightsong[2] for example https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SBTUcVxqEEA
This is called The Werther Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copycat_suicide
If you read 17th - 19th you may sometime come across suicide being referred to as in/out of fashion. Apparently it had cycles.
Big mistake. Foreign students of German literature should read all the Goethe they can get their hands on.
Similar to you, I kind of ignored N's great characterization of Goethe due to Werther, but only because I thought Goethe was a one-hit wonder pop-philosopher novelist when I first started hearing the name. I was honestly confused about how Werther could represent so much of N's philosophy! And then I read about its author and found one of the most accomplished individuals in the 18th/19th centuries.
I don't really get poetry in general but somehow in song form it works really well. I LOVE a lot of the songs from the 19th century, somehow the overwrought lyrics are perfect in that form.
Just to point out, songs are the general case of poetry. They're much, much, much, much more common than nonmusical poetry.
What harm did he do?
Goethe's book provides a catalogue of how colour is perceived in a wide variety of circumstances, and considers Isaac Newton's observations to be special cases.[3] Unlike Newton, Goethe's concern was not so much with the analytic treatment of colour, as with the qualities of how phenomena are perceived. Philosophers have come to understand the distinction between the optical spectrum, as observed by Newton, and the phenomenon of human colour perception as presented by Goethe.
... his aesthetic approach did not lend itself to the demands of analytic and mathematical analysis used ubiquitously in modern Science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_Colours
Wittgenstein also wrote an interesting book about it:
> Ich habe viel gesehen und noch mehr gedacht: Die Welt eröffnet sich mehr und mehr, auch alles, was ich schon lange weiß, wird mir erst eigen. Welch ein früh wissendes und spät übendes Geschöpf ist doch der Mensch!
I have seen much and thought still more: the world is opening up more and more. Even all those things I have long known are finally becoming part of me. What a creature is man: So early to gain knowledge, so late to use it!