Um no, the source is directly noted and link properly within text and in the source list of the article.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-qua...
which I assume is what was intended.
Fairy Nuff.
My real point is that the blog post lunk to here offers nothing extra to the original from Google, and to quote http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
In Submissions
...
Please submit the original source. If a blog post
reports on something they found on another site,
submit the latter.
I could be wrong, but this submission just looks like blog spam. Can you elaborate on what you think the submission adds over the original from Google?