Airbnb racks up hundreds of millions of dollars in losses -- WSJ
marketwatch.com
marketwatch.com
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
In this case, though, we downweighted the story the same way we've downweighted nearly every secondary coronavirus story, for exactly the same reason: otherwise the front page would have consisted of nothing else for the last week or more.
More explanation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22643249
(Well, usually happy to and always do.)
Airbnb threads, by the way, invariably turn into the same generic debate about Airbnb that some people seem to want to have over and over again: "I had a bad experience" vs. "I had a good experience". (Variations: "Airbnb ruined my neighborhood." "They rented the place next door to noisy people." And so on.) Just look at the comments in this thread.
HN moderators are trained to downweight such repetition, because it doesn't serve curiosity, which is what this site exists for. For some reason, Airbnb is one of the topics that people (or rather, commenters inclined to post in such threads) seem unable to bring curiosity to.
I agree that this thread has a lot of "bad experience / good experience" posts that aren't informative or productive (I'm actually amazed at how much worse this thread is compared to the previous one), but if HN Mods are behind this latest downweighting, then I don't think you've given it enough time to have substantive comments (ex: the fate of longtime employees' options which are going to hit the 10 year expiration) be posted given that it's only been on the front page for a brief amount of time. If Mods aren't responsible for this precipitous drop (which would be my instinct), then that's another problem all together.
Anyways, as a fellow mod on a different site, thanks for your team's work. I know it's not easy.
(Btw, please don't play the 'astroturfing' card unless there's hard evidence. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Disliking things on HN is not evidence, it's universal.)
Perceptions like this are usually sample bias, since we weight the things we notice more heavily, and what we notice is conditioned by our pre-existing opinions.
Why would anyone conceal this story if already it is written in the Wall Street Journal? Is this because it is worse for such a story to appear on Hacker News?
I'll definitely consider Airbnb more often from now on after this great costumer experience.
Well, that's just swell. First of all, this won't be over by April 14th, for example https://www.minneapolis.org/minneapolis-convention-center/co... "Events at the MCC will be restricted through May 10, 2020." second if you have a longer trip which got cancelled because originally it was scheduled to start before April 14th then all your bookings are toast.
I had zero problems cancelling my hotels.com reservation at Dorval though.
Very impressive customer-centric approach. I’m now much more likely to book with them again in the future.
Luckily, the host refunded me what they could, but Airbnb kept the service fees and occupancy taxes. The skeptic in me thinks they changed it to March 14 because they could cut out the people who check into places on Fridays (which I often do and assume others, too).
It seems many AirBnB employees' fortunes have very suddenly turned from having a handsome payoff to either having to wait indefinitely, a substantial haircut on that payday, and possibly having a hard time during a recession (along with the rest of us).
Crazy times
Our friends were hosting in Wellington when an earthquake struck. Airbnb refunded all bookings and sent them flowers.
We had a booking for a concert in Christchurch the weekend of the mosque shooting. Concert was canceled and Airbnb issued a refund.
And I’ve just had another refund due to not being able to travel this weekend.
10/10, would use again.