Not sure what that adds to the conversation, just my experience with forms and layers of people paid to do nothing but sign them.
In bureaucracies, many positions/people only have the power to slow down or stop the process. People need to feel important and powerful, and they cannot contribute to moving a process forward because they are, for example, a cybersecurity analyst or a lawyer.
So they say "well this process doesn't check box #134 on the list, we need to circle back and solution this" and they hang up and go back to reading reddit until the next meeting on their calendar.
It's awful to be a "doer" in a bureaucracy.
The sad thing is the USA and Europe were fully capable of handling this just like South Korea. That's why this is really about a failure of leadership.
I would like to think that this crisis will force Americans and Europeans to demand accountability, but I don't think that's going to happen. A token scapegoat will be found, "the people" will be congratulated for taking action in a time of emergency (and failure of government) and the leadership that were out-to-lunch when this stuff started going down will be accountable to nothing.