> My suspicion is that, when Pale Moon asks you not to use Web Components, they're doing so because their engine is old
Your suspicion is entirely wrong.
Your suspicion is entirely wrong.
MoonChild also told everybody that Let's Encrypt is a terrible idea, untrustworthy and nobody should use it. How did that end up?
I will give them props for actually doing it (plenty of people went "I'll just fork it" when Mozilla decided to change things but very few of them actually did all the resulting heavy lifting) not just talking about it. That's not nothing, but it doesn't make them right.
It is not true
for the simple fact that the next milestone release (v29) of pale moon will support WebComponents
> Neither of those really even contradict what smacktoward said, much less disprove it.
smacktoward repeats the same tired oversimplifications that PM is just "rebased itself on mainline Firefox circa Firefox 52" both my links prove that the above statement is fundamentally wrong.
In what way? Could someone summarize these sources?