I'm not sure I understand that. Because the signature guarantee
isn't "by" the transferring financial institution, is it? You want to transfer an account from "A" to "B" and you get the guarantee from someone that provides guarantees, call them "C". And if someone
forges the guarantee, then "C" never
did guarantee anything, so why would they be liable, let alone "A" and "B"?
Maybe I'm forgetting how this works...
...reading the wikipedia page, it sounds like the idea is to deal with forgeries of signatures provided to the guarantor. Not with forgeries of the guarantor's approval.
Then again, maybe you can't really forge a guarantee as long as it can be looked up or invalidated by their database.