John Titor
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
- there would be a war in Iraq, but it was not actually as big as the one that happened later
- after the Big War, there was a disease that forced everyone to live belowground
- he had a computer chip in his hand
- he had a son in the future named Gandalf
This all seemed pretty wacky, if harmless. My wife enjoyed relating it all in our Yahoo Groups email group. Then, in the next few years:
- the implanting of computer chips in pets became commonplace
- we started hearing about new viruses every few years
- we went to war in Iraq
- Lord of the Rings movies came out, which made it more likely someone would name their son "Gandalf"
So, I asked my wife, "what else did that guy say would happen?"
She said, "I don't remember it all now, but I put a really detailed list in my email to the Yahoo Group."
So, we look in the Yahoo Groups history, and...that month was missing from the history.
Oh, well. If he had said anything more significant than a global pandemic and WW3, I assume I would have remembered it.
In case someone had that archived...
I thought about asking him whether his parents chose the name but decided I didn’t want to know.
Then again, there is powerful normalcy-bias here. A name is acceptable if it is very similar to established names and if there is variance it's rarely among the established power class. So perhaps we'll need a massive disruption. The Scientologists will have to kill a large number of people and subjugate us to have names no longer just be James and Jennifer.
Or maybe we'll need a modern well-loved person to call their child Eliohann.
I thought scientologists wanted to keep Xenu under wraps?
(Never mind that the cat was let out of the bag long ago :-)
Now Frodo... that would just seem weird. Or Gandalf for that matter.
Who else would have named him?
As someone who hung out at the Albion Batcave circa 2000, I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion.
I'm not sure how old he was. I've never been very good at estimating people's ages, but I'd guess maybe in his 30s or 40s?
I had a few email conversations with Titor back in the day. Cryptic responses, kind of useless. Didn't convince me he was a time traveler.
Your wife's contact sounds more credible, such as it is.
Iraq had been at war 12 of the 20 years between 1980 and 2000. Not exactly a genius level prediction.
Implantable tracking chips in pets were invented in the mid 80's and have been a commercial thing since 1990.
We've had "new" viruses every few years especially since international travel has been a thing. The vast majority of these are just new strains of existing well known viruses. With genetic analysis, we are of course much better at tracking and identifying these things. And certainly going underground in a confined space with a bunch of other humans is the exact opposite of what you'd want to do to avoid a widespread human contagion.
Edit: As pointed out in the comments, this was originally a visual novel! There are many ways to enjoy this story.
Stiens;Gate is the only time traveller story that I know that establishes rules for time travel early on and actually sticks to these rules till the end.
Aside from that, it wasn't a great show (only 1 series made) and watching the first episode[1] back I can safely say it's not aged well either.
But it's one show that has always stuck in my memory for when the writers actually took the theory of time travel seriously.
There's also Primer, but Stein's gate is better than that movie.
Personally I find this much more refreshing than the usual the-world-will-collapse scenarios. It's easily one of my favorite films, just because of how different it is than it's ilk, I've yet to find something like it again.
Using time travel as a plot device versus using time travel to explore part of our humanity is a mark of great science fiction.
In particular, what's up with that hangar full of troops and equipment at the "end"?
A lot of people are tricked by the crystal clear beginning and assume that the end makes sense, but the movie goes into ambiguous mode about half-way through. Its audience interpretation, as opposed to a singular answer. (Contrast with something like Inception, which doesn't really have more than one interpretation).
Some people like ambiguous movies. I don't, which is why I kind of prefer Stein's Gate, where all actions are clear.
---------
Either way, its clear that the powerful organization is Aaron's goons. Aaron was the guy who played the stock market with the time machine, so its obvious that Aaron used the time-machine for ill-gotten gains at that point... and is using the money to fund a bigger time machine.
The other one (Abe) stayed back and kept on trying to travel to the past and messing around with the machine so that his (and Aaron's) past selves will eventually give up assuming that the machine doesn't work. But this seems to have been thwarted by one of the future-Aaron's as he has sent a recording detailing the whole scenario to some unknown recipient (this recording serves as the narration of the movie).
No, you can only go back to the point where you start the time machine. Secondly, its Aaron, so its probably his private corporation running the new machine. Aaron is the one who is manipulating the stock market and in it for the profit.
Its the "success" story for Aaron, he rebuilds a bigger time machine, but with the power of a corporation / large money backing him now (probably funded from repeatedly winning in the stock market). Aaron cannot stop the original experiment or otherwise travel to the past, but he can make money in the future.
------
There are roughly 3 machines you need to be aware of.
1. Machine #1 is what the movie is mostly about.
2. Partway through the movie, Machine#2 (failsafe) is revealed. The main character turned on the failsafe simultaneously with Machine #1, so if the time-travel got too confusing, he could always go back to the beginning and turn off Machine #1, cancelling the entire experiment.
3. The other main character, reset Machine #2. Instead of sending you back to the beginning, it now sends you to Day2 or so, preventing the change of the early days.
4. The conclusion, where Machine #3 is revealed. There was no leadup to machine#3, its just a bit of closure for the greedy Aaron.
-------
The movie goes off the rails and really stops making sense. I've put a lot of effort into trying to understand what they were going for... and ultimately came to the conclusion that Stein;s Gate is just a better thought out time travel plot.
I give Primer credit for being a relatively consistent time-travel movie with more thought put into it than the average time-travel timeline. But the ending is still in the "audience's hands", and still leaves ambiguity for the audience to figure out on their own.
A lot of actions in the middle of the movie don't seem to have any relevance to other events. The father (Thomas Granger) randomly coming in through the time machine but unconscious for example. While it is clear that Thomas Granger is from "some future timeline", such an interpretation naturally conflicts with the Primer theory thus far (which has no "multiple timeline", everything should be consistent)
There is also an Aaron clone running around, but it isn't really clear from what time the time-clone is from.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Folded_Himself
IMHO, Steins;Gate hasn't clarified what time travel really represents. When one travels from one world line to another, does the previous world line still exist? Is time travel a travel between parallel universes, a complete rewrite of history in the _same_ world, or something else?
In the first Steins;Gate anime, it seems that time travel means a rewrite of history (i.e. the conventional type of time travel in science fictions), but in Steins;Gate 0, time travel seems more like jumping between parallel universes.
https://polsy.org.uk/stuff/ytrestrict.cgi?ytid=https%3A%2F%2...
Either the sub or the dub is well worth watching, but the dub is one of my favorites. In particular, it shines with Okarin's mile-a-minute pseudo-scientific conspiracy rants.
If you like the premise and the characters, but are frustrated at the slow pace, hang in there. The plot does eventually kick into gear, and it doesn't waste any of the character development or world building.
PS3 and Vita was years later (2012)
I'd suggest going with the visual novel anyways, since it has a bit more meat (like multiple endings) even if the anime is a pretty faithful telling. It's also on so many different platforms (including iOS), so it's pretty accessible.
I'd avoid Steins;Gate Elite like a plague though.
It's not _bad_, but I don't see any reason to go with it over the original.
I remember a great short story I read about the first time traveler. They decided the first visit would be the Shakespeare. Shakespeare has no problems accepting that he's being visited by a time traveler, and asks what gifts the traveler brings.
The traveler is a bit confused, so Shakespeare explains that the early ones all bring gifts. The traveler has brought some gives, including a nicely bound volume of Shakespeare's plays. Shakespeare looks at it, comments on the nice binding, says something about maybe he can sell it, then decides probably not, and tosses it on a pile of other such volumes brought by other time travelers.
The first time traveler is now getting pretty confused, and says something like "but I'm the first time traveler!", to which Shakespeare answer "but not the first to arrive". This is something often overlooked in time travel stories--just because you are the first to leave for a given destination doesn't mean you are the first to arrive.
Shakespeare mentions that he's frequently bothered by time travelers, but at least doesn't have it as bad as Jesus--that guy can barely do anything without a time traveler showing up. Shakespeare explains he knows because a time traveler thought it would be interesting to take Shakespeare to meet Jesus once. All the great figures of history are frequently visited.
Somewhere in there Shakespeare provides some drink and tries to calm down the inexperienced time traveler, who is freaking out over all this. Shakespeare is an old hand at dealing with newbie time traveler freak outs.
Then a bunch of other time travelers arrive, but not to see Shakespeare. They are reporters from the first time traveler's future, there to interview him about his historic visit to Shakespeare.
[1] https://books.google.com/books?id=mh9zrji5zfAC&pg=PA185&lpg=...
https://www.library.illinois.edu/rbx/shakespeare400/2016/03/...
It looks like someone has republished it as a stand-alone story on Kindle [1]. That says 19 pages, which seems longer than the story I remember. I wonder if it was expanded from the original short story in Asimov's?
It's also in this anthology of science fiction humor stories [2].
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Merchant-Stratford-Frank-Ramirez-eboo...
[comment in the spirit of the thread]
And in that thread, someone also linked to the "everybody kills Hitler" story that I linked to (although they linked to it at its original site, which is still up, instead of linking to a republication link I did).
Looking through the short story titles in all those issues, and at the stories themselves whenever the title seemed like one that might be right, turned up nothing. :-(
It's possible that it is even older. I have a vague memory of bringing up that story in a discussion with someone at college, so it could have been something I read in the '70s. Back then I had a subscription to "Galaxy" science fiction magazine, and frequently picked up "Analog", "Asimov's", and "The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction" at the newsstand, and any one of those could be where I found it.
"Let's Go to Golgotha!"
That last line cracked me up!
Was anyone else here at the same showing?
Here's a review of the performance if anyone is curious -- http://www.timetravelreviews.com/theatre/traveler00.html
If there are aliens out there, why haven’t we met some by now?
If there are time travellers, why isn’t anybody making accurate predictions?
If rich people exist, why hasn’t one given me a million dollars?
1. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/stephen-hawking-time-t...
IBM 5110 PALM (Put All Logic in Microcode) CPU from 1978
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14483823
(The HN discussion in this article is great, in my opinion...)
Maybe it's not meant to work that way though; maybe you can uncouple time and meditate, and your other-conscious travels but in some other way than normal physical travel with forward time, or something like that.
According to John Titor:
> [T]his problem is actually the most difficult part of time travel. [...] Inside the displacement unit are a series of very sensitive clocks and gravity sensors. This system is called the VGL (variable gravity lock). [...B]efore the unit "leaves" a worldline, it takes a base reading of the local gravity and adjusts the Tipler sinusoid to 'lock' into that position. Although the temporal physics of this statement are wrong, in effect, it holds you to the 'Earth'. During travel, it periodically checks to see that the field has not varied. If it does, it stops and reverses course or drops out at that point.
https://www.strangerdimensions.com/2013/02/04/john-titor-the...
> A method for employing sinusoidal oscillations of electrical bombardment on the surface of one Kerr type singularity in close proximity to a second Kerr type singularity in such a method to take advantage of the Lense-Thirring effect, to simulate the effect of two point masses on nearly radial orbits in a 2+1 dimensional anti-de Sitter space resulting in creation of circular timelike geodesics conforming to the van Stockum under the Van Den Broeck modification of the Alcubierre geometry (Van Den Broeck 1999) permitting topology change from one spacelike boundary to the other in accordance with Geroch's theorem (Geroch 1967) which results in a method for the formation of G{umlaut over ( )}odel-type geodesically complete spacetime envelopes complete with closed timelike curves.
Still. Valiant effort. Better than most I've seen. Most of them are basically "Hi, I'm from $INTEGER years in the future and it turns out that you all are exactly right about everything and all the fashionable social concerns of your day/culture/sub-culture are in fact exactly correct! In the future, everybody who didn't (eat vegan / believe in BitCoin / get concerned about the landfill crisis / accept pholostigon theory) is dead because (they where all executed by super ethical governments for the crime of eating animals / died in pauper's prisons / literally buried in garbage / of the great Pholostigon War of 1773)! Ask me anything about how right your current social fashions are!" Not that Titor didn't more than dabble in that himself, though.
He said an organizarion pays him a paycheck then said he lives in a society based on bartering. There are contradictions in his posts.
The Mad Cow disease epidemic never happened, neither did the civil war he predicted, or any if the other stuff.
He also talked about using ancient IBM computers to fix some software bug from the future. Why on earth would you use that rather than a more power efficient/powerful computer?
I guess we'll find out when we have to send someone into the past to retrieve one so we can fix the bug.
To me it seems that in the future they for some reason need to access files that can only be opened on that computer.
If time travel is indeed possible and relatively common, it might be a better business decision to just send someone back in time to fetch a working version of that computer than try to recreate one from archived documentation (if any of it survived).
If time travel is common and either of these issues is raised then sending someone back to bring the real computer might be the easiest option.
https://www.ft.com/content/760546b6-c903-11e6-9043-7e34c07b4...
(submitted link as post as well, since it's really that interesting)
> Anime News Network reports the big reveal came during the live concert celebrating the 10th anniversary of the series. During the Science ADV Live S;G 1010th Anniversary, a teaser video was played revealing a live-action recreation of the game is being made by Hollywood for television.
https://uk.ign.com/articles/steinsgate-live-action-show-adap...
"Subsequent closer examination of Titor's assertions provoked widespread skepticism."
Ahh, it was the closer examination that lead to the skepticism.
Stuff of legends
(And we must not forget to check & remove 32bit timestamps from things, if we want these things to be predictable)
The occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was Jan 2nd 2016 (starting slightly earlier in 2015). If there’s an event that might closely mark a start of a civil war that ramps up, that’s high on my list.
We’ll see.
God help us if that's secretly gonna start killing a lot of people. I cringe everytime my wife's family offers venison for dinner....